Epistemological Intelligence

Bartlett, Dr. Steven James (2017) Epistemological Intelligence.

Full text available as:

[img] PDF (monograph) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.



The monograph’s twofold purpose is to recognize epistemological intelligence as a distinguishable variety of human intelligence, one that is especially important to philosophers, and to understand the challenges posed by the psychological profile of philosophers that can impede the development and cultivation of the skills associated with epistemological intelligence.

Item Type:Other
Keywords:epistemological intelligence, psychology of philosophers, psychology of individual differences
Subjects:Psychology > Clinical Psychology
Philosophy > Epistemology
ID Code:10211
Deposited By: Bartlett, Dr. Steven James
Deposited On:16 Feb 2017 18:04
Last Modified:16 Feb 2017 18:04

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Bartlett, Steven James (1969-70). Conviction and rationality. A paper presented at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Santa Barbara, CA. Available online from PhilPapers:

Bartlett, Steven James (1970). A relativistic theory of phenomenological constitution: A self-referential, transcendental approach to conceptual pathology. Vol. I: French; Vol. II: English. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Paris. University Microfilms Intl. #7905583. Available online from: and

Bartlett, Steven James (1975). Metalogic of reference: A study in the foundations of possibility. Starnberg, Germany: Max- Planck-Gesellschaft.

Bartlett, Steven James (1976). The idea of a metalogic of reference. Methodology & Science 9:3, pp. 85-92. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (1976-77). Patterns of problem-solving: A final report of work undertaken with the support of the Lilly Endowment. Saint Louis, MO: Saint Louis University. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (1980). Self-reference, phenomenology, and philosophy of science. Methodology and Science: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Empirical Study of the Foundations of Science and Their Methodology, 13:3, pp. 143-167. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (1982). Referential consistency as a criterion of meaning. Synthese, 52, pp. 267-82. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (1983a). Conceptual therapy: An introduction to framework-relative epistemology. St. Louis, MO: Studies in Theory & Behavior. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (1983b). Philosophy as conceptual therapy. Educational Resources Information Center, Natl. Inst. of Ed., Dept. of Health, Ed., & Welfare: May. Document #ED 224 402.

Bartlett, Steven James (1986a). Philosophy as ideology. Metaphilosophy, 17:1, pp. 1-13. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (1986b). Narcissism and philosophy. Methodology and Science: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Empirical Study of the Foundations of Science and Their Methodology, 19:1, pp. 16-26. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (1989). Psychological underpinnings of philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 20:3 & 4, pp. 295-305. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (2002). Roots of human resistance to animal rights: psychological and conceptual blocks.” Animal Law, 8, pp. 143-76. Available online from:

Bartlett, Steven James (2005). The pathology of man: A study of human evil. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Bartlett, Steven James (2008). The humanistic psychology of human evil: Ernest Becker and Arthur Koestler. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48:3, pp. 340-363. DOI: 10.1177/0022167807305249

Bartlett, Steven James (2011). Normality does not equal mental health: The need to look elsewhere for standards of good psychological health. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

Bartlett, Steven James (2015). The species problem: Inescapable ambiguity and redundancy. Monograph available from:




Bartlett, Steven James (2016). Paratheism: A proof that God neither exists nor does not exist. Published online; available from:

Binet, Alfred & Henri, Victor (1895). La psychologie individuelle. L’Année psychologique, 2, pp. 411-465.

Bruner, J. S. Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In Lindzey, G. (ed.), Handbook of social psychology, pp. 634-54. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Gardner, Howard (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: BasicBooks.

Gardner, Howard (1993/1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: BasicBooks. First pub. 1983.

Goleman, Daniel (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.

Guilford, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, pp. 88–140.

Husserl, Edmund (1965). Philosophy as rigorous science. Quentin Lauer (trans.). In Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy. New York: Harper and Row.

Koestler, Arthur (1967). The ghost in the machine. New York: Macmillan.

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, pp. 16-26.

Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell, & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind, pp. 301-326. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp. 480-498.

Mandelbaum, Allen & Moser, Barry (1980). The Divine Comedy of Dante Alighieri. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.

Mason, Lucia & Scirica, Fabio (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16, pp. 492-509.

Nickerson, Raymond S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2:2, pp. 175-220.

Passmore, John (1961). Philosophical reasoning. London: Gerald Duckworth.

Romanes, George John (1888). Mental evolution in man: Origin of human faculty. New York: Appleton.

Romanes, George John (1895). Mental evolution in animals. New York: Appleton.

Salovey, Peter & Mayer, John D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9:3, pp. 185-211.

Spearman, Charles E. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.

Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies in individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, pp. 342-357.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, pp. 161-188.

Thorndike, E.L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper’s Magazine, 140, pp. 227-235.

Tolstoy, Leo [Tolstoi, Lyof N.] (1899). What is art? Aylmer Maude (trans.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell & Co.

Watanabe, S. (1985). Pattern recognition: Human and mechanical. New York: Wiley.

Watanabe, Satosi (1965). Une explication mathématique du classement d’objets. In S. Dockx and P. Bernays (Eds.), Information and prediction in science: Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Académie lnternationale de Philosophie des Sciences, Brussels 3-8, September, 1962, pp. 39-76. New York: Academic Press.

Watanabe, Satosi (1969). Knowing and guessing: A quantitative study of inference and information. New York: John Wiley.

Watanabe, Satosi (1986). Epistemological relativity. Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, 7:1, pp. 1-14.

Weinstock, M., & Cronin, M. A. (2003). The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror-reasoning skill. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, pp. 161-181.

Weinstock, Michael (2009). Relative expertise in an everyday reasoning task: Epistemic understanding, problem representation, and reasoning competence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19:4, pp. 423–434.

Weinstock, Michael; Neuman, Yair; & Tabak, Iris (2004). Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students’ ability to identify fallacious arguments. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 29:1, pp. 77–94.


Repository Staff Only: item control page