The role of individual differences and patterns of resolution in the formation of dominance orders in domestic hens triads

Cloutier, Sylvie and Beaugrand, Jacques P. and Lague, Paul C. (1996) The role of individual differences and patterns of resolution in the formation of dominance orders in domestic hens triads. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img] PDF


This research compares the role of initial individual characteristics to that of patterns of resolution in which successive dominance relationships are established during the formation of triads in the domestic hen. Combining weight, prior victory or defeat in the site of encounter, and comb size, we created three levels of asymmetries on characteristics for triads of hens. The effects of these asymmetries were then examined on the resultant hierarchies and on the order of conflict resolution within triads under two different conditions of assembly. In one condition (simultaneous triad), the three hens were simultaneously introduced to each other and could thus freely choose their opponent. In the other condition (step-assembled triad), the hen predicted to occupy the highest rank was left on standby and introduced once the two other hens had settled dominance, thus disrupting the normal process of hierarchy formation by imposing the first sequence of dominance settlement. We found that the structure of triadic hierarchies can be predicted from individual characteristics existing prior to hierarchy formation. No differences in the resultant structures were found between conditions of introduction, though different paths of conflict resolution were followed indicating that individual differences had a more determining role on the resultant hierarchies than patterns of resolution. Beside showing that individual differences determine resultant triadic structures, the present results also show that the same end structures can be reached by following resolution paths that are not necessarily of the Double Dominance and Double Subordinance types as prescribed by Chase's model. It is also found that in the simultaneous condition hens select each other to form pairs. Therefore, individuals do not meet at random but choose each other as opponents. The two hens predicted from individual differences to occupy the highest ranks first settle dominance, followed by settlement between the winner of the previous encounter and the bystander.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:dominance hierarchy; prior experience of victory and defeat; size; individual differences; agonistic behaviour; hen; Gallus domesticus
Subjects:Biology > Animal Behavior
Biology > Ethology
Psychology > Comparative Psychology
ID Code:1960
Deposited By: Beaugrand, Jacques
Deposited On:04 Dec 2001
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Allee, W.C., Collias, N. E. and Lutherman, C.Z. 1939. Modification of the social order in flocks of hens by the injection of testosterone propionate. Physiol. Zool., 12: 412-440.

Barchas, P.R. and Mendoza, S.D. 1984. Emergent hierarchical relationships in rhesus macaques: an application of Chase's model. In: P.R. Barchas (Editor), Social hierarchies: Essays toward a sociophysiological perspective. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 23-44.

Beacham, J.L. 1988. The relative importance of body size and aggressive experience as determinants of dominance in pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus. Anim. Behav., 36: 621-623.

Beaugrand, J.P. 1984. Modèles de dominance et théorie de l'évolution. -- In: J.J. Lévy and H.H. Cohen (Editors), Darwin après Darwin . P.U.Q., Québec, pp. 111-137.

Beaugrand, J.P. and Zayan, R.C. 1985. An experimental model of aggressive dominance in Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces, Poeciliidae). Behav. Processes, 10: 1-52.

Beaugrand, J.P. and Zayan, R.C. 1986. Outline of a model on aggressive dominance in green swordtail male fish (Xiphophorus helleri, Pisces, Poeciliidae). In: P.W. Colgan and R.C. Zayan (Editors), Quantitative models in ethology. Privat, Toulouse, pp. 9-23.

Beaugrand, J.P., Goulet, C. and Payette, D. 1991. Outcome of dyadic conflict in male green swordtail fish, Xiphophorus helleri: effects of body size and prior dominance. Anim. Behav., 41: 417-424.

Bernstein, I.S. and Gordon, T.P. 1980. The social component of dominance relationships in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Anim. Behav., 28: 1033-1039.

Braddock, J.C. 1945. Some aspects of the dominance-subordination relationship in the fish Platypoecilus maculatus. Physiol. Zool., 18: 176-195.

Chase, I.D. 1974. Models of hierarchy formation in animal societies. Behav. Sci., 19: 374-382.

Chase, I.D. 1980. Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: a comparative perspective. Amer. Soc. Rev., 45: 905-924.

Chase, I.D. 1982a. Dynamics of hierarchy formation: the sequential development of dominance relationships. Behaviour, 80: 218-240.

Chase, I.D. 1982b. Behavioral sequences during dominance hierarchy formation in chickens. Science, 216: 439-440.

Chase, I.D. 1985. The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation: an application of the 'jigsaw puzzle' approach. Anim. Behav., 33: 86-100.

Cloutier, S., Beaugrand, J.P. and Laguë, P.C. 1995. The effect of prior victory or defeat in the same site as that of subsequent encounter on the determination of dyadic dominance in the domestic hen. Behav. Processes, 34 293-298.

Collias, N.E. 1943. Statistical analysis of factors which make for success in initial encounters between hens. Amer. Nat., 77: 519-538.

Craig, J.V., Bismas, D.K. and Guhl, A.M. 1969. Agonistic behavior influenced by strangeness, crowding and heredity in female domestic fowl (Gallus gallus). Anim. Behav., 17: 498-506.

Eaton, G.G. 1984. Aggression in adult male primates: a comparison of confined Japanese macaques and free-ranging olive baboons. Int. J. Primatol., 5: 145-160.

Francis, R.C. 1983. Experiential effects on agonistic behavior in the paradise fish, Macropodus opercularis. Behaviour, 85: 292-313.

Frey, D.F. and Miller, R.J. 1972. The establishment of dominance relationships in the blue gourami, Trichogaster trichopterus (Pallas). Behaviour, 42: 8-62.

Gibson, R.N. 1968. The agonistic behaviour of juvenile Blennus pholis L. (Teleosti). Behaviour, 30: 192-217.

Guhl A.M. and Ortman, L.L. 1953. Visual patterns in the recognition of individuals among chickens. Condor, 55: 287-298.

Jackson, W.M. 1988. Can individual differences in history of dominance explain the development of linear dominance hierarchies ? Ethology, 79: 71-77.

Jackson, W.M. 1992. Further examination and testing of individual attributes models are needed. Anim. Behav., 43: 687.

King, M.G. 1965. The effect of social context on dominance capacity of domestic hens. Anim. Behav., 13: 132-133.

Kruijt, J.P. 1964. Ontogeny of social behaviour in Burmese red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Behaviour, suppl. 12: 1-201.

Landau, H.G. 1951a. On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics. Bull. Math. Biophysics, 13: 1-19.

Landau, H.G. 1951b. On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: II. Some effects of possible social factors. Bull. Math. Biophysics, 13: 245-262.

Ligon, J.D., Thornhill, R., Zuk, M. and Johnson, K. 1990. Male-male competition, ornamentation and the role of testosterone in sexual selection in red jungle fowl. Anim. Behav., 40: 367-373.

Locati, M. and Lovari, S. 1991. Clues for dominance in female chamois: Age, weight, or horn size ? Agg. Behav., 17: 11-15.

McDonald, A.L., Heimstra, N.W. and Damkot, D.K. 1968. Social modification of agonistic behaviour in fish. Anim. Behav., 16: 437-441.

McBride, G. 1958. The measurement of aggressiveness in the domestic hen. Anim. Behav., 6: 87-91.

McBride, G., Parer, I.P. and Foenander, F. 1969. The social organization and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim. Behav., Mono. 2: 127-181.

Mendoza, S.D. and Barchas, P.R. 1983. Behavioural processes leading to linear status hierarchies following group formation in rhesus macaques. J. Hum. Evol., 12: 185-192.

Muckensturm, B. 1969. La signification de la livrée nuptiale de l'épinoche. Rev. Comp. Anim., 3: 39-64.

Murchison, C. 1935. The experimental measurement of a social hierarchy in Gallus domesticus. II. The identification and inferential measurements of a social reflex no. 1 and social reflex no. 2 by means of social discrimination. J. Soc. Psychol., 6: 3-29.

Potter, J.H. 1949. Dominance relations between different breeds of domestic hens. Physiol. Zool., 22: 261-280.

Rasa, A.O. 1969. Territoriality and the establishment of dominance by means of visual cues in Pomacentrus jenkinsi (Pisces, Pomacentridae). Z. Tierpsychol., 26: 825-845.

Rasa, A.O. 1971. Appetence for aggression in juvenile Damsel fish. Z. Tierpsychol., suppl. 7.

Ratner, S.C. 1961. Effect of learning to be submissive on status in the peck order of domestic fowl. Anim. Behav., 9: 34-37.

Rushen, J. 1985. Explaining peck order in domestic chickens. Bird Behav., 6: 1-9.

Schjelderup-Ebbe, T. 1922. Beiträge zur sozialpsychologie des haushunhs. Z. Psychol., 88: 224-252.

Siegel, S. and Castellan, jr. N.J. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition, (Book), McGraw-Hill, Montreal, 399pp.

Slater, P. 1986. Individual differences and dominance hierarchies. Anim. Behav., 34: 1264-1265.

Thinès, G. and Heuts, B.A. 1968. The effects of submissive experiences on dominance and aggressive behaviour of Xiphophorus (Pisces, Poeciliidae). Z. Tierpsychol., 25: 139-154.

Zayan, R. 1975. Modification des effets liés à la priorité de résidence chez Xiphophorus (Pisces, Poeciliidae): le rôle de l'expérience immédiate de dominance et de soumission. Revue du Comportement Animal, 8: 296-311.

Zayan, R. 1987. Analysis of dominance and subordination experiences in sequences of paired encounters between hens. In: R.C. Zayan and I.J.H. Duncan (Editors), Cognitive aspects of social behaviour in the domestic fowl. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 182-320.


Repository Staff Only: item control page