But What Have You Done for Us Lately?: A Correction

Green, Christopher D. (2002) But What Have You Done for Us Lately?: A Correction. (Unpublished)

Full text available as:

[img] HTML


Green & Vervaeke (1997), we wrote that Portuguese is an VSO language. This claims turns out to be incorrect. I present the source of this information and the correct information in this paper. The mistake, however, appears to have little impact on the point we were making at the time.

Commentary on: Green, Christopher D. and Vervaeke, John (1997) But What Have You Done for Us Lately?: Some Recent Perspectives on Linguistic Nativism. [Book Chapter]
Item Type:Other
Keywords:language, innateness, nativism, creoles
Subjects:Psychology > Comparative Psychology
ID Code:2091
Deposited By: Green, Christopher D.
Deposited On:19 Feb 2002
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

Commentary/Response Threads

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Green, C. D. & Vervaeke, J. (1997). But what have you done for us lately?: Some recent perspectives on linguistic nativism. In

D.M. Johnson & C.E. Erneling (Eds.), The future of the cognitive revolution (pp. 149-163). Oxford: Oxford University

Press. (Also on CogPrints).

Muysken, P. (1988). Are creoles a special type of language? In Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. 2. Edited by

Frederick Newmeyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Repository Staff Only: item control page