Impact of Generalist Physician Initiatives on Residency Selection

Malloy MD, Michael H. and Stroup-Benham PhD, Christine A. (2001) Impact of Generalist Physician Initiatives on Residency Selection. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:



Objective:To compare the residency selection choices of students who experienced courses resulting from generalist physician initiatives to choices made by students prior to the implementation of those courses and to describe the characteristics of students selecting primary care residencies. Background:In the fall of 1994 a first year Community Continuity Experience course was initiated and in the summer of 1995 a third year Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Clerkship was begun at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. These courses were inserted into the curriculum to enhance and promote primary care education. Design/Methods:We examined the residency selections of cohorts of graduating medical students before (1992-1996) and after (1997-1999) the implementation of the primary care courses. Survey information on career preferences at matriculation and in the fourth year of medical school were available for students graduating after the programs began. We compared the career preferences and characteristics of those students who selected a primary care residency to those who did not. Results:Prior to the implementation of the programs, 45%(425/950) of students graduating selected primary care residencies compared to 45% (210/465) of students participating in the programs (p=0.88). At matriculation, 45% of students had listed a primary care discipline as their first career choice. Among the students who had indicated this degree of primary care interest 61% ended up matching in a primary care discipline. At year 4, 31% of students indicated a primary care discipline as their first career choice and 92% of these students matched to a primary care residency. By univariate analysis, minority students (53%) were more likely to select a primary care residency than non-minority students (40%); students in the two lowest grade point average quartiles (55% and 50%) selected primary care residencies compared to 37% and 38% of students in the top 2 quartiles; and students who stated that income potential had little or no impact on their choice were more likely to select a primary care residency (48%) than those who said income potential was important (37%). Conclusions:We observed no significant trend towards higher proportions of graduating students selecting primary care discipline residencies as a result of implementing courses that emphasized primary care. Those students expressing an interest in a primary care discipline at their entrance into medical school were more likely to select a primary care residency. A more significant impact on graduating students interested in primary care may be made through the medical student selection process than by altering the curriculum.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:Generalist physician initiative, primary care, residency selection, career choice, medical education, health professions education
Subjects:JOURNALS > Medical Education Online > MEO Peer Reviewed
ID Code:2385
Deposited By: David, Solomon
Deposited On:08 Aug 2002
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Taggart MP, Wartman SA, and Wessen AF. An analysis of medical students’ residency and specialty choices. Soc Sci Med 1987;25:1063-1068.

2. Greer T and Carline JD. Specialty choice by medical students: recent graduate follow-up survey at the University of Washington. Fam Med 1989;21:127-131.

3. Campos-Outcalt D. Family practice specialty selection: a research agenda. Fam Med 1991;23:609-619.

4. Kiker BF and Zeh M. Relative income expectations, expected malpractice premium costs, and other determinants of physician specialty choice. J Health and Soc Behav 1998;39:152-167.

5. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, and Morgenstern. Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. Lifetime Learning Publ, Belmont, CA. 1982: 447-457.

6. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 6.12 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1996.

7. Rosenthal MP, Marquette PA, and Diamond JJ. Trends along the debt-income axis: implications for medical student’s selections of family practice careers. Acad Med 1996;71:675-677.

8. Grayson MS, Newton DA, and Whitley TW. First-year medical students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward primary care careers. Fam Med 1996;28:337-342.

9. Wright S, Wong A, and Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:53-56.

10. Basco WT and Reigart JR. When do medical students identify career-influencing physician role models? Acad Med 2001;76:380-382.

11. Golden WE. Initial career choices of medical school honors graduates in the early 1970s and 1980s. Acad Med 1989;64:616-621.

12. Babbott D, Weaver SO, Baldwin DC. Person characteristics, career plans, and specialty choices of medical students electoed to alpha omega alpha. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:576-580.

13. Fenderson BA, Hojat M, Damjanov I, and Rubin E. Characteristics of medical students completing an honors program in pathology. Hum Pathol 1999;30:1296-1301.

14. Jarecky RK, Donnelly MB, Rubeck RF, and Schwartz RW. Changes in the patterns of specialties selected by high and low academic performers before and after 1980. Acad Med 1993;68:158-160.

15. Reed VA, Jernstedt GC, and Reber ES. Understanding and improving medical student specialty choice: a synthesis of the literature using decision theory as a referent. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2001;13:117-129.


Repository Staff Only: item control page