Suppressing Visual Feedback in written composition: Effects on Processing Demands and Coordination of the Writing

Atwell, M. (1981). The evolution of text: The interrelation of read-ing and writing in the composing process. Unpublished

Doctoral dissertation, Indiana. Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production

more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29,

591-620. Brown, J. S., McDonald, J. L., Brown, IL., & Carr, TH. (1988).

Adapting to processing demands in discourse production: The case of handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology:

Human Perception and Performance, 14, 45-59. Chafe, W L. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writ-ing

and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, Vol. 9, Advances in dis-course

comprehension (pp. 35-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Coirier, P., & Andriessen, J. (Eds.) (2000). Foundations of argu-mentative

text processing. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Dansac, C., & Passerault, J.-M. (1996). Effects of re-reading suppression on the temporal parameters in text production.

Graphic presentation at the 1996 European Writing Conference, Barcelona, Spain, October.

Ellis, A. W (1988). Normal writing processes and peripheral acquired dysgraphias. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3,

99-127. Ellis, A. W, Young, A. W, & Flude, B. M. (1987). "Afferent" dys-graphia

in a patient and in normal subjects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 99-127.

Fayol, M. (1999). Writing: From on-line management problems to strategies. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), Cognitive

demands ofwriting. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Flamen, J.-E, & Piolat, A. (1999). On visual feedback in writing

by 10-12-year-olds: An on-line approach. In M.-F. Crété & E. Espéret (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Writing Conference

(pp. 383-384). Poitiers, France: MSHS, University of Poitiers.

Galbraith, D., & Sumpner, C. (1996). Effects of reduced visual feedback on writing. Graphic presentation at the 1996

European Writing Conference, Barcelona, Spain, October. Gould, J. D. (1980). Experiments on composing letters: Some

facts, some myths, and some observations. In L. W Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp.

98-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Grabowski, J. (1999). Verbal modes of knowledge diagnosis: The

writing superiority effect. In M.-F. Crété & E. Espéret (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Writing Conference (pp. 11-16).

Poitiers, France: MSHS, University of Poitiers. Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting

research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 7-87.

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of the writing processes. In L. W Gregg & E. S. Steinberg (Eds.),

Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Hull, G. A., & Smith, W L. (1983). Interrupting visual feedback in writing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 963-978

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes.

Memory and Cognition, 15, 256-266. Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York:

Oxford University Press. Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In

C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp.

57-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kellogg, R. T. (1999). Components of working memory in writ-ing.

In M. Torrance & G. C. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive 9

9 Page 10

21 8 OLIVE AND PIOLAT

demands of writing (pp. 25-42). Amsterdam: Amsterdam

University Press. Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Competition for working memory among

writing processes. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 175-192.

Kerr, B. (1973). Processing demands during mental operations. Memory and Cognition, 1, 401-412.

Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. E. (1995). Is writing as difficult as it seems? Memory and Cognition, 23, 767-779.

Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. E. (1996). Writing signatures. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories,

methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 149-161).

Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. McCutchen, D. (1988). Functional automaticity in children's

writing: A problem of metacognitive control. Written Communication, 5, 306-324.

McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8,

299-325.

Olive, T. (1999). Economic de la production de textes : Gestion des ressources attentionnelles et mode d'activation des

processus rédactionnels [Economy of text composition:

Management of cognitive resources and activation of the

writing processes]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

University of Provence. Olive, T, & Kellogg, R. T. (in press). Concurrent activation of

high-and low-level production processes in written composi-tion. Memory and Cognition.

Olive, T, Kellogg, R. T., & Piolat, A. (2001). The triple-task tech-nique for studying the process of writing. In T. Olive & C. M.

Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 31-58). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer

Academic Publishers. Olive, T., Piolat, A., & Roussey, J.-Y. (1997). Effort cognitif

et mobilisation des processus en production de textes : Effet de

l'habileté rédactionnelle et du niveau de connaissances [Cognitive effort and time processing of the writing

processes: Writing skill and level of knowledge]. In D. Mellier & A. vam Hoffe (Eds.), Attention et contrôle cognitif.

Mécanismes, développement des habiletés, pathologies (pp.

71-85). Rouen, France: Publications de l'Université de

Rouen.

Piolat, A. (1982). L'écrit et l'oral comme systèmes de production verbale [Writing and speaking as systems ofverbal production].

Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Provence, France.

Piolat, A., & Olive, T. (2000). Comment étudier le coût et le déroulement de la rédaction de textes? La méthode de triple-tâche:

Un bilan méthodologique [ How to study the cost and unfolding of text composition? The triple task method].

L'Année Psychologique, 100, 465-502.

Piolat, A., Olive, T., Roussey, J.-Y, Thunin, O., & Ziegler, J. C. (1999). Scriptkell: A computer assisted tool for measuring the

relative distribution of time and cognitive effort in writing and other tasks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and

Computers, 31, 113-121.

Piolat, A., Roussey, J.-Y, Olive, T., & Farioli, R (1996). Charge mentale et mobilisation des processus rédactionnels : Examen

de la procédure de Kellogg [Cognitive load and activation of the writing processes: Assessing Kellogg's method].

Psychologie Française, 41, 339-354.

Smyth, M. M., & Silvers, G. (1987). Functions of vision in the control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 65, 47-64.

Teleman, U. (198 1). On visual feedback in writing. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Applied Linguistics (pp.

424-425). Lund, Sweden: Lund University.

Van Doorn, R. R. A., & Keuss, PIG. (1992). The role of vision in the temporal and spatial control of handwriting. Acta

Psychologica, 81, 269-286.

Van Doorn, R. R. A., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1993). Does the production of letter strokes in handwriting benefits from vision? Acta

Psychologica, 82, 275-290.

Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165-191.

Van Galen, G. P, Smyth, M. M., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Hylkema, H. (1989). The role of short-term memory and the

motor buffer in handwriting under visual and nonvisual guidance. In R. Plamondon, C. Y Suen, & M. L. Simner (Eds.),

Computer recognition and human production of handwriting

(pp. 253-271). Singapore: World Scientific.

Zesiger, P (1995). Ecrire. Approches cognitive, neuropsychologique et développementale [Writing: Cognitive, neuropsychological

and developmental approaches]. Paris: Presses Universitaires

de France.