The art of chicken sexing

Horsey, Richard (2002) The art of chicken sexing. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:



Expert chick sexers are able to quickly and reliably determine the sex of day-old chicks on the basis of very subtle perceptual cues. They claim that in many cases they have no idea how they make their decisions. They just look at the rear end of a chick, and ‘see’ that it is either male or female. This is somewhat reminiscent of those expert chess players, often cited in the psychological literature, who can just ‘see’ what the next move should be; similar claims have been made for expert wine tasters and experts at medical diagnosis. All of these skills are hard-earned and not accessible to introspection. But is there really anything unusual about the chicken sexer, the chess grand master, the wine buff or the medical expert? I argue that there is not. In fact, we are all constantly making categorizations of this sort: we are highly accurate at categorizing natural kinds, substances, artefacts, and so on. We do so quickly and subconsciously, and the process is completely inaccessible to introspection. The question is, why is it so difficult to acquire skills such as chicken sexing, when we automatically acquire the ability to categorize other objects. In this paper, I argue that we have mechanisms for learning the cues necessary for categorization, but that these mechanisms require selective attention to be given to the relevant features. We automatically acquire the ability to categorize certain objects because we have inbuilt attention directors causing us to attend to diagnostic cues. In cases such as chicken sexing, where we do not automatically develop categorization abilities, our inbuilt attention directors do not cause us to attend to diagnostic cues, and out attention therefore has to be drawn to these cues in another way, such as through training.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Subjects:Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
ID Code:3255
Deposited By: Horsey, Richard
Deposited On:29 Oct 2003
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Allan, M. D. 1958. Learning perceptual skills: The Sargeant system of recognition training. Occupational Psychology, 32: 245–252.

Ashworth, A. R. S. & I. E. Dror 2000. Object identification as a function of discriminability and learning presentations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6: 148–157.

Berretty, P. M., P. M. Todd & L. Martignon 1999. Categorization by elimination. In Gigerenzer et al. 1999: 235–254.

Biederman, I. & M. M. Shiffrar 1987. Sexing day-old chicks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13: 640–645.

Brandom, R. B. 1998. Insights and blindspots of reliabilism. The Monist, 81: 371–392.

Cleeremans, A., A. Destrebecqz & M. Boyer 2000. Implicit learning: news from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2: 406–416.

de Waal, F. B. M. 2001. The Ape and the Sushi Master. New York: Basic Books.

Ericsson, K. A. & A. C. Lehmann 1996. Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 273–305.

Gigerenzer, G. & D. G. Goldstein 1999. Betting on one good reason: the Take The Best heuristic. In Gigerenzer et al. 1999: 75–95.

Gigerenzer, G., P. M. Todd & The ABC Research Group 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goettl, B. P. 1996. The spacing effect in aircraft recognition. Human Factors, 38: 34–49.

Harnad, S. 1996. Experimental analysis of naming behavior cannot explain naming capacity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65: 262–264.

Jiang, Y. & M. M. Chun 2001. Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A: 1105–1124.

Lewicki, P., T. Hill & M. Czyzewska 1992. Nonconscious Acquisition of Information. American Psychologist, 47: 796–801.

Martin, R. D. 1994. The Specialist Chick Sexer: A History, A World View, Future Prospects. Melbourne: Bernal Publishing.

Rayner, K., B. R. Foorman, C. A. Perfetti, D. Pesetsky & M. S. Seidenberg 2002. How should reading be taught? Scientific American, 286.3 (March 2002): 70–77.

Sperber, D., D. Premack & A. J. Premack (eds.) 1995. Causal Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Orden, G. C. 1987. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15: 181–198.

Van Orden, G. C., J. C. Johnston & B. L. Hale 1988. Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14: 371–386.


Repository Staff Only: item control page