Ariew, Andre (1996) Innateness and Canalization. [Conference Paper]
Full text available as:
ASCII
28Kb |
Abstract
Cognitive scientists often employ the notion of innateness without defining it. The issue is, how is innateness defined in biology? Some critics contend that innateness is not a legitimate concept in biology. In this paper I will argue that it is. However, neither the concept of high heritability nor the concept of flat norm of reaction (two popular accounts in the biology literature) define innateness. An adequate account is found in developmental biology. I propose that innateness is best defined in terms of C. H. Waddington's concept of canalization.
Item Type: | Conference Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | innateness, canalization, Waddington, heritability, norms of reaction |
Subjects: | Biology > Population Biology Philosophy > Philosophy of Science |
ID Code: | 330 |
Deposited By: | Ariew, Andre |
Deposited On: | 18 Jun 1998 |
Last Modified: | 11 Mar 2011 08:53 |
Metadata
- ASCII Citation
- Atom
- BibTeX
- Dublin Core
- EP3 XML
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- EndNote
- HTML Citation
- ID Plus Text Citation
- JSON
- METS
- MODS
- MPEG-21 DIDL
- OpenURL ContextObject
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- RDF+N-Triples
- RDF+N3
- RDF+XML
- Refer
- Reference Manager
- Search Data Dump
- Simple Metadata
- YAML
Repository Staff Only: item control page