Cogprints

Folk Theory of Mind: Conceptual Foundations of Social Cognition

Malle, Bertram F. (2003) Folk Theory of Mind: Conceptual Foundations of Social Cognition. [Book Chapter] (In Press)

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
 PDF
499Kb

Abstract

The human ability to represent, conceptualize, and reason about mind and behavior is one of the greatest achievements of human evolution and is made possible by a “folk theory of mind” — a sophisticated conceptual framework that relates different mental states to each other and connects them to behavior. This chapter examines the nature and elements of this framework and its central functions for social cognition. As a conceptual framework, the folk theory of mind operates prior to any particular conscious or unconscious cognition and provides the “framing” or interpretation of that cognition. Central to this framing is the concept of intentionality, which distinguishes intentional action (caused by the agent’s intention and decision) from unintentional behavior (caused by internal or external events without the intervention of the agent’s decision). A second important distinction separates publicly observable from publicly unobservable (i.e., mental) events. Together, the two distinctions define the kinds of events in social interaction that people attend to, wonder about, and try to explain. A special focus of this chapter is the powerful tool of behavior explanation, which relies on the folk theory of mind but is also intimately tied to social demands and to the perceiver’s social goals. A full understanding of social cognition must consider the folk theory of mind as the conceptual underpinning of all (conscious and unconscious) perception and thinking about the social world.

Item Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:Social cognition, folk psychology, theory of mind, attribution, intentionality,
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Psychology > Social Psychology
ID Code:3315
Deposited By: Malle, Bertram F.
Deposited On:13 Dec 2003
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Abelson, R. P., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 243-250.

Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Audi, R. (1993). Action, intention, and reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Baird, J. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Making sense of human behavior: Action parsing and intentional inference. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 193-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Early referential understanding: Infants' ability to recognize referential acts for what they are. Developmental Psychology, 29, 832-843.

Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. (1999). Action analysis: A gateway to intentional inference. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 215-240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Baldwin, D. A, & Tomasello, M. (1998). Word learning: A window on early pragmatic understanding. In E. V. Clark (Ed), The proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual child language research forum (pp. 3-23). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1992). The girl who shouted in the church. In R. Campbell (ed.), Mental lives: Case studies in cognition (pp. 11-23). Oxford: Blackwell.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen, Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 3-20). New York: Oxford University Press.

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37-46.

Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

Blackburn, J., Gottschewski, K., George, E., & L—, N. (2000, May). A discussion about theory of mind : From an autistic perspective. Proceedings of Autism Europe’s 6th International Congress, Glasgow. Scottish Society for Autism. Downloaded from <http://www.autistics.org/library/AE2000-ToM.html> on May 1, 2001.

Blakemore, S., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561-567.

Bogdan, R. J. (2000). Minding minds: Evolving a reflexive mind by interpreting others. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process; A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56-71.

Brentano, F. C. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, & L. L. McAlister, Transl.) New York: Humanities Press. (Originally published in 1874.)

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bull, P. E. (1987). Posture and gesture. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

Buss, A. R. (1978). Causes and reasons in attribution theory: A conceptual critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1311-1321.

Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Hix, H. R. (1998). The role of inhibitory processes in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief. Child Development, 69, 672-691.

Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. (Eds.) (1996). Theories of theories of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Speech acts and hearers’ beliefs. In N. V. Smith (Ed.), Mutual knowledge (pp. 1-36). New York: Academic Press.

Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy, 60, 685-700.

D’Andrade, R. (1987). A folk model of the mind. In D. Holand & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 112-148). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713-726.

DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203-243.

De Villiers, J. (2000). Language and theory of mind: What are the developmental relationships? In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 83-123). New York: Oxford University Press.

Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dittrich, W. J., & Lea, S. E. G. (1994). Visual perception of intentional motion. Perception, 23, 253-268.

Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dunn, J. (1999). Mindreading and social relationships. In M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects (pp. 55-71). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Fincham, F. D, Beach, S. R, & Nelson, G. (1987). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: III. Causal and responsibility attributions for spouse behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 71-86.

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and vices. In P. Foot, Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Frith, U. (2000). Cognitive explanations of autism. In K. Lee (Ed.) Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings (pp. 324-337). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.

Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers’ assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378-391.

Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Bíró, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193.

Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332-346.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis : An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goldman, A. I. (1989). Interpretation psychologized. Mind and Language, 4, 161-185.

Goldman, A. I. (2001). Desire, intention, and the simulation theory. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 207-225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gopnik, A. (1998). Explanation as orgasm. Minds and Machines, 8, 101-118.

Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1994). The theory theory. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257-293). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gordon, R. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind and Language, 1, 158-71.\

Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–95.

Greenwood, J. D. (Ed.). (1991). The future of folk psychology: Intentionality and cognitive science. Cambridge, Engl.: Cambridge University Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Towards a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316-328.

Harman, G. (1976). Practical reasoning. Review of Metaphysics, 29, 431-463.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

Higgins, E. T., McCann, C. D., & Fondacaro, R. (1982). The “communication game”: Goal-directed encoding and cognitive consequences. Social Cognition, 1,21-37.

Hilton, D. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65-81.

Hirschberg, N. (1978). A correct treatment of traits. In H. London (Ed.), Personality: A new look at metatheories (pp. 45-68). New York: Wiley.

Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.). (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hoffman, M. L. (1993). Empathy, social cognition, and moral education. In A. Garrod (Ed.), Approaches to moral development: New research and emerging themes (pp. 157-179). New York: Teacher’s College Press.

Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 233-253.

Humphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of intellect. In P. P. G. Bateson and R. Hinde (Eds.), Growing points in ethology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Knight, C. (Eds.) (1998). Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ickes, W. (Ed.). (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford.

Ickes, W. (2001). Subjective and intersubjective paradigms for the study of social cognition. Chapter to appear in J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.

Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.

Jones, E. E., & Thibaut, J. W. (1958). Interaction goals as bases of inference in interpersonal perception. In R. Tagiuri & L. Petrullo (Eds.). Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 151-178). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Kalish, C. (1998). Reasons and causes: Children's understanding of conformity to social rules and physical laws. Child Development, 69, 706-720.

Kant, I. (1998/1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. (Translated by Mary Gregor.) New York: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published 1785.)

Kant, I. (1998/1787). Critique of Pure Reason. (Translated and edited by Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood). New York: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published 1787.)

Kidd, R. F., & Amabile, T. M. (1981). Causal explanations in social interaction: Some dialogues on dialogue. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 307-328). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Klein, K. J. K., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences and motivation in empathic accuracy: When it pays to care. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720-730.

Krauss, R. M., Fussell, S. R., & Chen, Y. (1995). Coordination of perspective in dialogue: Intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. In I. Markova, C. F. Graumann, & K. Scherer (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 124-145). Cambridge, Engl.: Cambridge University Press.

Leslie, A. M. (1992). Autism and the ‘Theory of mind’ module. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 18-21.

Leslie, A. M. (1995). A theory of agency. In A. J. Premack, D. Premack, & D. Sperber (Ed.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 131-149). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Locke, D., & Pennington, D. (1982). Reasons and other causes: Their role in attribution processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 212-223.

Lyon, T. D. (1993). Young children’s understanding of desire and knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Lyons, W. (1986). The disappearance of introspection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Malle, B. F. (1998). F.Ex: Coding scheme for people’s folk explanations of behavior. University of Oregon. Downloaded from http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~bfmalle/fex.html on May 1, 2001.

Malle, B. F. (1999). How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 23-48.

Malle, B. F. (2001a). Folk explanations of intentional action. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 265-286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Malle, B. F. (2001b). The relation between language and theory of mind in development and evolution. Chapter to appear in T. Givon & B. F. Malle, The evolution of language out of pre-language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Malle, B. F., & Ickes, W. (2000). Fritz Heider: Philosopher and psychologist. In G. A. Kimble & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Portraits of Pioneers in Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 193-214). Washington, DC and Mahwah, NJ: American Psychological Association and Erlbaum.

Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997a). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 101-121.

Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997b). Which behaviors do people explain? A basic actor-observer asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 288-304.

Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (2001). The distinction between desire and intention: A folk-conceptual analysis. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 45-67). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Malle, B. F., Knobe, J., O’Laughlin, M., Pearce, G. E., & Nelson, S. E. (2000). Conceptual structure and social functions of behavior explanations: Beyond person–situation attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 309-326.

Malle, B. F., Knobe, J., & Nelson. S. E. (2001). Actor-observer asymmetries in behavior explanation: A comprehensive investigation. Manuscript in preparation.

Malle, B. F., Moses, L. J., & Baldwin, D. A. (Eds.). (2001). Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Malle, B. F., & Pearce, G. E. (2001). Attention to behavioral events during social interaction: Two actor-observer gaps and three attempts to close them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 278-294.

McCabe, K. A., Smith, V. L., & LePore, M. (2000). Intentionality detection and “mindreading”: Why does game form matter? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 4404-4409.

McClure, J., & Hilton, D. (1997). For you can’t always get what you want: When preconditions are better explanations than goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 223-240.

McClure, J., & Hilton, D. (1998). Are goals or preconditions better explanations? It depends on the question. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 897-911.

Mele, A. R. (2001). Acting intentionally: Probing folk notions. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 27-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Miller, D. T., & Ross., M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213-225.

Moses, L. J. (2001). Some thoughts on ascribing complex intentional concepts to young children. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 69-83). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103.

Nelson, S. E., & Malle, B. F. (2000, April). Explaining intentional actions in the context of social perception and judgment. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Portland, Oregon.

Nelson-LeGall, S. A. (1985). Motive-outcome matching and outcome foreseeability: Effects on attribution of intentionality and moral judgments. Developmental Psychology, 21, 323-337.

Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. Willed and automatic control of behavior. In G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1-17). New York: Plenum Press.

O’Laughlin, M., &. Malle, B. F. (in press). How people explain actions performed by groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.

Povinelli, D. J. (1996). Chimpanzee theory of mind: The long road to strong inference. In P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 243-329). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Povinelli, D. M. (2001). On the possibilities of detecting intentions prior to understanding them. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 225-248). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Premack, D. (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36, 1-16.

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1, 515-526.

Rosen, L. (Ed.)(1995). Other intentions: Cultural contexts and the attribution of inner states. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Definition and interpretation of interaction effects. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 143-146.

Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schneider, D. J. (1991). Social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 527-561.

Schult, C. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1997). Explaining human movements and actions: Children’s understanding of the limits of psychological explanation. Cognition, 62, 291-324

Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.

Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shaver, K. G. (1975). An introduction to attribution processes. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Shultz, T. R., & Wells, D. (1985). Judging the intentionality of action-outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 21, 83-89.

Slugoski, B. R., Lalljee, M., Lamb, R., & Ginsburg, G. P. (1993). Attribution in conversational context: Effect of mutual knowledge on explanation-giving. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 219-238.

Snare, F. (1991). Morals, motivation and convention: Hume’s influential doctrines. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Tagiuri, R., & Petrullo, L. (1958). Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Tedeschi, J. T., & Reiss, M. (1981). Verbal strategies as impression management. In C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary social behaviour (pp. 271-309). London: Academic Press.

Tomasello, M. (1998). Uniquely primate, uniquely human. Developmental Science, 1, 1-16.

Trabasso, T., & Stein, N. L. (1994). Using goal-plan knowledge to merge the past with the present and the future in narrating events on line. M. M. Haith, J. B. Benson (Eds.), The development of future-oriented processes. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on mental health and development (pp. 323-349). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Turnbull, W. (1986). Everyday explanation: The pragmatics of puzzle resolution. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 16, 141-160.

Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.

Wellman, H. (1990). The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Wellman, H. M, Hickling, A. K, & Schult, C. A. (1997). Young children's psychological, physical, and biological explanations. In H. W. Wellman, & K. Inagaki (Eds.), The emergence of core domains of thought: Children's reasoning about physical, psychological, and biological phenomena (pp. 7-25). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wellman, H. W., & Phillips, A. T. (2001). Developing intentional understandings. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 125-148). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wellman, H. M., & Woolley, J. D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35, 245-275.

White, P. A. (1991). Ambiguity in the internal/external distinction in causal attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 259-270.

Whiten, A. (1999). The evolution of deep social mind in humans. In M. C. Corballis & S. E. G. Lea (Eds.), The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 173-193). New York: Oxford University Press.

Wilson, J. Q. (1997). Moral judgment: Does the abuse excuse threaten our legal system? New York: HarperCollins.

Wyer, R. S., Srull, T. K., Gordon, S. E., & Hartwick, J. (1982). Effects of processing objectives on the recall of prose material. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 674-688.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Transl.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Woodward, A. L., Sommervile, J. A., & Guajardo, J. J. (2001). How infants make sense of intentional action. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 149-170). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Yuill, N., & Perner, J. (1988). Intentionality and knowledge in children’s judgments of actor’s responsibility and recipient’s emotional reaction. Developmental Psychology, 24, 358-365.

Zajonc, R. B. (1960). The process of cognitive tuning in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 159-167.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.