Delivery, Management and Access Model for E-prints and Open Access Journals within Further and Higher Education

Swan, Alma and Needham, Paul and Probets, Steve and Muir, Adrienne and O’Brien, Ann and Oppenheim, Charles and Hardy, Rachel and Rowland, Fytton (2005) Delivery, Management and Access Model for E-prints and Open Access Journals within Further and Higher Education. [Newspaper/Magazine Article] (Unpublished)

Full text available as:



This study identified three models for open access provision in the UK: (a) the centralised model,where e-prints of articles are first deposited directly into a national archive and then madeaccessible to users and service providers; (b) the distributed model, where e-prints are depositedin any one of a distributed network of OAI-compliant institutional, subject-based and open-access journal archives, whose metadata are then harvested and made accessible to users and serviceproviders; and (c) the model we have termed the ‘harvesting’ model, a variant of the distributedmodel in which the harvested metadata are first improved, standardised or enhanced before being made accessible to users and service providers. In considering the relative merits of these models, we addressed not only technical concerns but also how e-print provision (by authors) can be achieved, since without this content provision there can be no effective e-print delivery service (for users). For technical and cultural reasons, this study recommends that the centralised model should not be adopted for the proposed UK service. This would have been the costliest option and it would have omitted the growing body of content in distributed institutional, subject-based, and open-access journal archives. Moreover, the central archiving approach is the ‘wrong way round’ with respect to e-print provision since for reasons of academic and institutional culture and so long as effective measures are implemented, individual institution-based e-print archives are far more likely to fill (and fill quickly) than centralised archives, because institutions and researchers share a vested interested in the impact of their research output, and because institutions are in a position to mandate and monitor compliance, a position not enjoyed by centralised archives. The study therefore recommends the ‘harvesting’ model [(c) above], constituting a UK national service founded upon creating an interoperable network of OAI-compliant, distributed, institution-based e-print archives. Such a service, based on harvesting metadata (and, later, full-text) from distributed, institution-based e-print archives and open access journals would be cheaper to implement and would more effectively garner the nation’s scholarly research output. The model also permits further enhancement of the metadata to provide improved features and functionality.

Item Type:Newspaper/Magazine Article
Keywords:open access, eprints, self-archiving, institutional repositories, distributed archiving, open archives initiative
Subjects:Electronic Publishing > Archives
ID Code:4122
Deposited By: Harnad, Stevan
Deposited On:16 Mar 2005
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

UK House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee

Recommendations: http://www.publications.

National Institutes of Health recommendations:

Rowland, F., Swan, A., Needham, P., Probets, S., Muir, A., Oppenheim,

C., O?Brien, A. and Hardy, R. Delivery, management and access model

for E-prints and open access journals. Serials Review 2004, in


Swan, A., Needham, P., Probets, S., Muir, A., O'Brien, A., Oppenheim,

C., Hardy, R. and Rowland, F. Delivery, management and access model

for e-prints and open access journals within further and higher

education. 2004.

Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting.


Citebase Search.

Directory of Open Access Journals (Lund University Library).

Scientific Electronic Library Online. e-print archive.

Cogprints: Cognitive Sciences Eprints Archive.

Institutional Archives Registry.

Eprints-UK statistics.

Daedalus project at Glasgow University.

Needham, P., Sidwell, K., Bevan, S. and Harrington, J. The MAGiC

Project. managing access to grey literature collections. Final

report ? October 2002.

McGauran, P. $12 million for managing university information. 2003.

Eprints UK.

SHERPA project.

Focus on Access to Institutional Resources (FAIR) Programme.

Pinfield, S. Open archives and UK institutions: an overview. D-Lib

Magazine 2003:9 (3). Available at

Harnad, S. and Brody, T. Comparing the impact of open access (OA)

vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 2004:10


Harnad, S., Carr, L., Brody, T. and Oppenheim, C. Mandated online

RAE CVs linked to university eprint archives: enhancing UK research

impact and assessment. Ariadne, 2003:35. Registry of Departments and Institutions who have

adopted an OA self-archiving policy.

Eprints Handbook: Actions for Departments to Achieve Open Access.

Self-Archiving FAQ for the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI).

OSI Eprints Handbook.

RoMEO self-archiving policies by publisher.

RoMEO summary statistics.

Swan, A. and Brown, S. JISC/OSI journal authors survey report. 2004.

Swan, A. and Brown, S. Authors and open access publishing. Learned

Publishing, 2004:17 (3), 219-24.

Cliff, P. ePrints UK ? architecture: 1.032003, based on project

proposal. 2003.

Martin, R. ePrints UK: developing a national e-prints archive.

Ariadne, 2003:35.

van Veen, T. and Oldroyd, B. Search and retrieval in the European

Library: a new approach. D-Lib Magazine, 2004:10, Feb.

Macleod, D. Google launches research archive project. Guardian

Unlimited. 2004.,9830,1191090,00.html


Repository Staff Only: item control page