Open access self-archiving: An Introduction

Swan, Alma (2005) Open access self-archiving: An Introduction. [Departmental Technical Report]

Full text available as:



This, our second author international, cross-disciplinary study on open access had 1296 respondents. Its focus was on self-archiving. Almost half (49%) of the respondent population have self-archived at least one article during the last three years. Use of institutional repositories for this purpose has doubled and usage has increased by almost 60% for subject-based repositories. Self-archiving activity is greatest amongst those who publish the largest number of papers. There is still a substantial proportion of authors unaware of the possibility of providing open access to their work by self-archiving. Of the authors who have not yet self-archived any articles, 71% remain unaware of the option. With 49% of the author population having self-archived in some way, this means that 36% of the total author population (71% of the remaining 51%), has not yet been appraised of this way of providing open access. Authors have frequently expressed reluctance to self-archive because of the perceived time required and possible technical difficulties in carrying out this activity, yet findings here show that only 20% of authors found some degree of difficulty with the first act of depositing an article in a repository, and that this dropped to 9% for subsequent deposits. Another author worry is about infringing agreed copyright agreements with publishers, yet only 10% of authors currently know of the SHERPA/RoMEO list of publisher permissions policies with respect to self-archiving, where clear guidance as to what a publisher permits is provided. Where it is not known if permission is required, however, authors are not seeking it and are self-archiving without it. Communicating their results to peers remains the primary reason for scholars publishing their work; in other words, researchers publish to have an impact on their field. The vast majority of authors (81%) would willingly comply with a mandate from their employer or research funder to deposit copies of their articles in an institutional or subject-based repository. A further 13% would comply reluctantly; 5% would not comply with such a mandate. In a separate exercise we asked the American Physical Society (APS) and the Institute of Physics Publishing Ltd (IOPP) what their experiences have been over the 14 years that arXiv has been in existence. How many subscriptions have been lost as a result of arXiv? Both societies said they could not identify any losses of subscriptions for this reason and that they do not view arXiv as a threat to their business (rather the opposite -- this in fact the APS helped establish an arXiv mirror site at the Brookhaven National Laboratory).

Item Type:Departmental Technical Report
Additional Information:This is the Introduction, Executive Summary and References from a document written in May 2005 reporting the findings of a large-scale survey of scholarly researcher behaviour with respect to open access, specifically the ‘green’ route to OA via self-archiving. The Introduction serves as a stand-alone starter document for those wishing to acquaint themselves with self-archiving without too much pain. The full study report, for those who are interested, can be found at any of the following URLs: 20author%20study.pdf
Keywords:open access, self-archiving, research impact, institutional repositories, citation, publication, journals
Subjects:Electronic Publishing > Archives
ID Code:4406
Deposited By: Harnad, Stevan
Deposited On:19 Jun 2005
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Swan, Alma and Brown, Sheridan (2004) Report of the JISC/OSI open accessournal authors survey. pp 1-76.

Swan, Alma and Brown, Sheridan (2004) Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17 (3), 219-224 http://lysander.ingentaselect.comvl=15729124/cl=20/nw=1/rpsv/cgibin/linker?ini=alpsp&reqidx=/cw/alpsp/09531513/v17n3/s7/p219

Harnad, Stevan (1995) A Subversive Proposal. In: Ann Okerson & James O'Donnell (Eds.) Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads; A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing. Washington, DC., Association of Research Libraries, June 1995.

Harnad, S (1999) Free at last: the future of peer-reviewed journals. D-Lib Magazine, 5, 12.

Self archiving FAQ.

American Scientist Open Access Forum.

SHERPA: Publisher copyright policies and self-archiving. Journal self-archiving policies.

Swan A, Needham P, Probets P, Muir A, O'Brien A, Oppenheim C, Hardy R and Rowland F (2004). Delivery, management and access model for E-prints and open access journals within further and higher education (Report of a JISC study). pp 1-121.

Alma Swan, Paul Needham, Steve Probets, Adrienne Muir, Anne O'Brien, Charles Oppenheim, Rachel Hardy, Fytton Rowland and Sheridan Brown (2005). Developing a model for e-prints and open access journal content for UK higher and further education. Learned Publishing, 18 (1), 25-40.

Lawrence, S (2001) Online or invisible? Nature 411, 6837, p521

Kurtz, M (2004) Restrictive access policies cut readership of electronic research journal articles by a factor of two.

Harnad, S and Brody, T (2004) Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10 (6),

Antelman, K (2005) Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65 (1), 372-282.

Swan, A and Brown, S (2002) Authors and Electronic Publishing: The ALPSP research study on authors' and readers' views of electronic research communication. pp 1-76. ALPSP, Worthing.

Swan, A and Brown, S (2003) Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new technology. Learned Publishing, 16 (1), 28-33.


Wellcome Trust and National Library of Medicine in talks for worldwide open access archive (press release).

Rowlands, Ian, Nicholas, Dave and Huntingdon, Paul (2004). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want? Findings of an international survey of author opinion: project report. Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research, City University, London, UK.

Publisher copyright policies and self-archiving.

UK House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee: Tenth Report. Scientific publications: Free for all?

US Government House Appropriations Bill HR 5006 recommendations:

Carr, L and Harnad, S (2005) Keystroke Economy: A Study of the Time and Effort Involved in Self-Archiving.

Pinfield, S (2005). A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories. Serials, 18 (1), 30-34.

Pinfield, S (2004) Self-archiving publications. In: Gorman, G E and Rowland, F (eds). International yearbook of Library and Information Management 2004-2005: Scholarly publishing in an electronic era. London: Facet. Pp118-145.

Registry of Institutional Self Archiving Policies.

Perneger, T V (2004) Relation between online 'hit counts' and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ. BMJ 329, 546-7.

Brody, T and Harnad S (2005) Early web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. In press (Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology)


Repository Staff Only: item control page