Initial Free Recall Data Characterized and Explained By Activation Theory of Short Term Memory

Tarnow, Dr Eugen (2011) Initial Free Recall Data Characterized and Explained By Activation Theory of Short Term Memory. [Preprint]

Full text available as:

PDF - Submitted Version


The initial recall distribution in a free recall experiment is shown to be predictably different from the overall free recall distribution including an offset which can cause the least remembered items to be almost completely absent from the first recall. Using the overall free recall distribution as input and a single parameter describing the probability of simultaneous reactivated items per number of items in the presented list, activation theory not only qualitatively but quantitatively describes the initial recall distributions of data by Murdock (1962) and Kahana et al (2002). That the initial free recall can be simply explained in terms of the overall recall suggests that theories of memory based on interference or other context sensitive information are false since knowledge of the future would have to be incorporated to predict the initial recall.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:free recall, memory search, short term memory
Subjects:Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience > Neuropsychology
ID Code:7660
Deposited By: Tarnow, Dr. Eugen
Deposited On:27 Oct 2011 01:35
Last Modified:27 Oct 2011 01:35

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Anderson JR (1981) Interference: the relationship between response latency and response accuracy. J Exp Psychol [Hum Learn] 7:326–343.

Barrouillet, P. et al. (2004) Time constraints and resource-sharing in adults’ working memory spans. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133, 83–100.

Barrouillet P, Camos V (2009). Interference: unique source of forgetting in working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(4), 145-146.

Berman MG, Jonides J, Lewis RL (2009). In search of decay in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory and Cognition 35 (2) 317-333.

Deese J (1959) On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58(1) 17-22

Dobrunz, LE. (2002) Release probability is regulated by the size of the readily releasable vesicle pool at excitatory synapses in hippocampus. : Int. J. Devl Neuroscience Vols. 20: 225-236.

Farrell S, Lewandowsky S (2004). Modelling transposition latencies: Constraints for theories of serial order memory. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 115-135.

Kahana M, Associative retrieval processes in free recall, Memory & Cognition 1996,24 (1), 103-109.

Kahana MJ, Howard MW, Zaromb F, WingField A (2002), “Age Dissociates Recency and Lag Recency Effects in Free Recall”

Kandel ER (2001) The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 294:1030–1038

Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Brown G, (2009) No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (3) 120-126.

Lewandowsky, S., & Farrell, S. (2008). Short-term memory: New data and a model. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol 49, 49, 1-48.

Murdock Jr., Bennet B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol 64(5): 482-488.

Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? Psychological Review, 115(3), 544-576.

Peterson LR, Peterson MJ (1959) Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58, 193-198

Rubin DC, Hinton S, Wenzel A.(1999). The Precise Time Course of Retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vols. 25:1161-1176.

Tarnow E (2008). Response probability and response time: a straight line, the Tagging/Retagging interpretation of short term memory, an operational definition of meaningfulness and short term memory time decay and search time. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2 (4) p. 347-353.

Tarnow E (2010a) Short term memory bowing effect is consistent with presentation rate dependent decay, Cognitive Neurodynamics 2010, 4(4), 367.

Tarnow E (2010b) Why The Atkinson-Shiffrin Model Was Wrong From The Beginning, WebmedCentral NEUROLOGY 2010;1(10):WMC001021.

Tarnow E (2010c) There Is No Limited Capacity Memory Buffer in the Murdock (1962) Free Recall Data. Cognitive Neurodynamics 2010, 4(4), 395.

Waugh NC, Norman DA, Primary Memory, Psychological Review, Vol 72(2), Mar 1965, 89-104


Repository Staff Only: item control page