@prefix epid: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix epx: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix event: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix ep: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix eprel: .
@prefix dct: .
<>
foaf:primaryTopic ;
rdfs:comment "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "psyche-6-09-rensink.pdf"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "indexcodes.txt"^^xsd:string .
dc:format "text/html";
dc:title "HTML Summary of #1050 \n\nWhen Good Observers Go Bad: Change Blindness, Inattentional Blindness, and Visual Experience\n\n";
foaf:primaryTopic .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:hasIndexCodesVersion ;
eprel:hasVersion ,
;
eprel:hasVolatileVersion ,
;
eprel:haspreviewThumbnailVersion ;
rdf:type bibo:Document,
ep:Document;
rdfs:label "When Good Observers Go Bad: Change Blindness, Inattentional Blindness, and Visual Experience (PDF)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isIndexCodesVersionOf ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "When Good Observers Go Bad: Change Blindness, Inattentional Blindness, and Visual Experience (Indexer Terms)"^^xsd:string .
rdf:_1 .
bibo:abstract "Several studies (e.g., Becklen & Cervone, 1983; Mack & Rock, 1998; Neisser & Becklen, 1975) have found that observers attending to a particular object or event often fail to report the presence of unexpected items. This has been interpreted as inattentional blindness (IB), a failure to see unattended items (Mack & Rock, 1998). Meanwhile, other studies (e.g., Pashler, 1988; Phillips, 1974; Rensink et al., 1997; Simons, 1996) have found that observers often fail to report the presence of large changes in a display when these changes occur simultaneously with a transient such as an eye movement or flash of the display. This has been interpreted as change blindness (CB), a failure to see unattended changes (Rensink et al., 1997).\nIn both cases there is a striking failure to report an object or event that would be quite visible under other circumstances. And in both cases there is a widespread (although not universal) belief that the underlying cause has to do with the absence of attention. The question then arises as to how these effects might be related. Is CB the same thing as IB? If not, what is the relation between them? And given that these phenomena deal with failures of subjective perception, what can they teach us about the nature of our visual experience? In particular, what can they teach us about the role played by visual attention?"^^xsd:string;
bibo:authorList ;
bibo:issue "9";
bibo:status ,
;
bibo:volume "6";
dct:creator ;
dct:date "2000-08";
dct:isPartOf ,
;
dct:subject ,
,
;
dct:title "When Good Observers Go Bad: Change Blindness, Inattentional Blindness, and Visual Experience"^^xsd:string;
ep:hasDocument ,
;
rdf:type bibo:Article,
ep:EPrint,
ep:JournaleEPrint;
rdfs:seeAlso .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Cognitive Psychology" .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Perceptual Cognitive Psychology" .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Philosophy of Mind" .
foaf:familyName "Rensink"^^xsd:string;
foaf:givenName "Ronald A."^^xsd:string;
foaf:name "Ronald A. Rensink"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Person .
foaf:name "Psyche"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type bibo:Collection .