@prefix epid: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix epx: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix event: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix ep: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix eprel: .
@prefix dct: .
<>
foaf:primaryTopic ;
rdfs:comment "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "Cartwright.html"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "fig1.gif"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "indexcodes.txt"^^xsd:string .
dc:format "text/html";
dc:title "HTML Summary of #1300 \n\nCartwright on Laws and Composition\n\n";
foaf:primaryTopic .
dct:hasPart ,
;
ep:hasFile ,
;
rdf:type bibo:Document,
ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Cartwright on Laws and Composition (HTML)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isIndexCodesVersionOf ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Cartwright on Laws and Composition (Indexer Terms)"^^xsd:string .
rdf:_1 .
bibo:abstract "Cartwright attempts to argue from an analysis of the composition of forces, and more generally the composition of laws, to the conclusion that laws must be regarded as false. A response to Cartwright is developed which contends that properly understood composition poses no threat to the truth of laws, even though agreeing with Cartwright that laws do not satisfy the facticity requirement. My analysis draws especially on the work of Creary, Bhaskar, Mill, and points towards a general rejection of Cartwrights view that laws, especially fundamental laws, should be seen as false. "^^xsd:string;
bibo:authorList ;
bibo:status ;
dct:creator ;
dct:date "2000";
dct:isPartOf ;
dct:subject ;
dct:title "Cartwright on Laws and Composition"^^xsd:string;
ep:hasDocument ,
;
rdf:type bibo:Article,
ep:EPrint,
ep:PreprintEPrint;
rdfs:seeAlso .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Philosophy of Science" .
foaf:familyName "Spurrett"^^xsd:string;
foaf:givenName "David Jon"^^xsd:string;
foaf:name "David Jon Spurrett"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Person .