--- abstract: 'Cartwright attempts to argue from an analysis of the composition of forces, and more generally the composition of laws, to the conclusion that laws must be regarded as false. A response to Cartwright is developed which contends that properly understood composition poses no threat to the truth of laws, even though agreeing with Cartwright that laws do not satisfy the ‘facticity’ requirement. My analysis draws especially on the work of Creary, Bhaskar, Mill, and points towards a general rejection of Cartwright’s view that laws, especially fundamental laws, should be seen as false. ' altloc: [] chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: ~ confdates: ~ conference: ~ confloc: ~ contact_email: ~ creators_id: [] creators_name: - family: Spurrett given: David Jon honourific: '' lineage: '' date: 2000 date_type: published datestamp: 2001-02-10 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/13/00 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: [] eprint_status: archive eprintid: 1300 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/1300/1/Cartwright.html full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: ~ issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: 'Cartwright, Fundamental Laws, Composition' lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:32 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: show note: ~ number: ~ pagerange: ~ pubdom: FALSE publication: ~ publisher: ~ refereed: FALSE referencetext: | ARISTOTLE. (1936) Minor Works, translated by W. S. Hett, (London, Heinemann). ANSCOMBE, G. E. M. and GEACH, P. T. (1973) Three Philosophers: Aristotle, Aquinas, Frege (Oxford, Blackwell). BHASKAR, R. (1978) A Realist Theory of Science, Second Edition, (Brighton: The Harvester Press). CARTWRIGHT, N. (1980) ‘Do the Laws of Physics State the Facts?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61, pp. 75-84. CARTWRIGHT, N. (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie (Oxford: Clarendon Press). CARTWRIGHT, N. (1989) Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement (Oxford: Clarendon Press. CARTWRIGHT, N. (1994) ‘Fundamentalism vs. the Patchwork of Laws’, Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, XCIV (1994), pp. 279-292. CARTWRIGHT, N. (1995) ‘Précis of Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55, pp. 153-156. CARTWRIGHT, N. (1999) The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). CHALMERS, A. (1987) ‘Bhaskar, Cartwright and Realism in Physics’, Methodology and Science, 20, pp. 77-96. CREARY, L. G. (1981) ‘Causal Explanation and the Reality of Natural Component Forces’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 148-157. DUGAS, R. (1954) A History of Mechanics (Neuchâtel: Éditions du Griffon). EELLS, E. (1995) ‘Cartwright on Probabilistic Causality: Types, Tokens, and Capacities’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55, pp. 169-175. FEYNMAN, R. (1965) The Character of Physical Law (London: British Broadcasting Corporation). GALILEO, G. (1914) Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, translated by Henry Crew and Alfonso de Salvio (New York: Macmillan). GIBBINS, P. (1984) ‘Nancy Cartwright’s New Philosophy of Physics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35, 4, pp. 390-401. GLENNAN, S. S. (1997) ‘Capacities, Universality, and Singularity’, Philosophy of Science 64, pp. 605-626. HUMPHRIES, P. (1995) ‘Abstract and Concrete’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55, pp. 157-161. MCLAUGHLIN, B. (1992) ‘The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism’, in A. BECKERMANN, H. FLOHR, and J. KIM (Eds.), Emergence or Reduction? (Berlin: de Gruyter). MESSIAH, A. (1961) Quantum Mechanics (Amsterdam: North Holland). MILL, J. S. (1972) A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Deductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, (2 vols.) J. M. ROBSON (Ed.), Volumes VII and VIII of J. M. ROBSON (General editor) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press). MORRISON, M. (1995) ‘Capacities, Tendencies and the Problem of Singular Causes’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55, pp. 163-168. NAGEL, E. (1963) ‘Wholes, Sums, and Organic Unities’, in: D. LERNER (Ed.), Parts and Wholes (New York: The Free Press). NEWTON, I. (1934) Principia, (2 Volumes), translated by ANDREW MOTTE, revised by FLORIAN CAJORI, (Berkeley: University of California Press). RUSSELL, B. (1903) The Principles of Mathematics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). SPURRETT, D. (1999) ‘Fundamental Laws and the Completeness of Physics’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13, No.3, pp. 261-274. THOMSON, J. J. (1977) Acts and Other Events (Ithaca: Cornell). relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 8 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:37:15 subjects: - phil-sci succeeds: ~ suggestions: ~ sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: Cartwright on Laws and Composition type: preprint userid: 466 volume: ~