This site has been permanently archived. This is a static copy provided by the University of Southampton.

@misc{cogprints1593, title = {Grounding symbols in sensorimotor categories with neural networks}, author = {Stevan Harnad}, year = {1995}, keywords = {cognition, computation, symbol grounding, neural networks }, url = {http://cogprints.org/1593/}, abstract = {It is unlikely that the systematic, compositional properties of formal symbol systems -- i.e., of computation -- play no role at all in cognition. However, it is equally unlikely that cognition is just computation, because of the symbol grounding problem (Harnad 1990): The symbols in a symbol system are systematically interpretable, by external interpreters, as meaning something, and that is a remarkable and powerful property of symbol systems. Cognition (i.e., thinking), has this property too: Our thoughts are systematically interpretable by external interpreters as meaning something. However, unlike symbols in symbol systems, thoughts mean what they mean autonomously: Their meaning does not consist of or depend on anyone making or being able to make any external interpretations of them at all. When I think "the cat is on the mat," the meaning of that thought is autonomous; it does not depend on YOUR being able to interpret it as meaning that (even though you could interpret it that way, and you would be right).} }