---
abstract: |-
  Searle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism
                                 (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in
                                 the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself
                                 thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).
altloc:
  - http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.searle.html
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
  - family: Harnad
    given: Stevan
    honourific: ''
    lineage: ''
date: 2001
date_type: published
datestamp: 2001-06-19
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/16/22
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name:
  - family: Bishop
    given: M.
    honourific: ''
    lineage: ''
  - family: Preston
    given: J.
    honourific: ''
    lineage: ''
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 1622
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/1622/1/harnad00.searle.html
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: inpress
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'Searle, Chinese Room Argument, Turing Test, Symbol Grounding, computationalism, cognitivism, robotics, language functionalism, neuroscience'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:42
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: ~
pubdom: FALSE
publication: Essays on Searle's Chinese Room Argument
publisher: Oxford University Press
refereed: FALSE
referencetext: |
  Cangelosi, A. & Harnad, S. (2000) The Adaptive Advantage of Symbolic Theft Over Sensorimotor
  Toil: Grounding Language in Perceptual Categories. Evolution of Communication (Special Issue on
  Grounding) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.language.html 
  
  Churchland, P.A. (1990) Could a machine think? Scientific American 262: 32 - 37. 
  
  Dietrich, E. (1990) Computationalism. Social Epistemology 4: 135 - 154. 
  
  Fodor, J. A. (1975) The language of thought New York: Thomas Y. Crowell 
  
  Fodor, J. A. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical appraisal.
  Cognition. 28: 3 - 71. 
  
  Greco, A., Cangelosi, A., & Harnad, S. (2000) A Connectionist Model for Categorical Perception and
  Symbol Grounding. Connection Science. ftp://gracco.irmkant.rm.cnr.it/pub/angelo/cangelosi-evocom.ps
  
  Harnad, S. (1982a) Neoconstructivism: A unifying theme for the cognitive sciences. In: Language,
  mind and brain (T. Simon & R. Scholes, eds., Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum), 1 - 11.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad82.neoconst.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1982b) Consciousness: An afterthought. Cognition and Brain Theory 5: 29 - 47.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad82.consciousness.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (ed.) (1987) Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition. New York: Cambridge
  University Press. http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad87.categorization.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1989) Minds, Machines and Searle. Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial
  Intelligence 1: 5-25. ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad89.searle.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1990a) The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D 42: 335-346.
  ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad90.sgproblem.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1990b) Against Computational Hermeneutics. (Invited commentary on Eric Dietrich's
  Computationalism) Social Epistemology 4: 167-172.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad90.dietrich.crit.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1990c) Lost in the hermeneutic hall of mirrors. Invited Commentary on: Michael Dyer:
  Minds, Machines, Searle and Harnad. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2:
  321 - 327. http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad90.dyer.crit.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1990d) Scholarly Skywriting and the Prepublication Continuum of Scientific Inquiry.
  Psychological Science 1: 342 - 343 (reprinted in Current Contents 45: 9-13, November 11 1991).
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad90.skywriting.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1991a) Other bodies, Other minds: A machine incarnation of an old philosophical problem.
  Minds and Machines 1: 43-54.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad91.otherminds.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1991b) Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: The Fourth Revolution in the Means of Production of
  Knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review 2 (1): 39 - 53
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad91.postgutenberg.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1992) The Turing Test Is Not A Trick: Turing Indistinguishability Is A Scientific Criterion.
  SIGART Bulletin 3(4) (October) 9 - 10.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad92.turing.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1993) Artificial Life: Synthetic Versus Virtual. Artificial Life III. Proceedings, Santa Fe
  Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Volume XVI.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad93.artlife.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1994a) Levels of Functional Equivalence in Reverse Bioengineering: The Darwinian
  Turing Test for Artificial Life. Artificial Life 1(3): 293-301. Reprinted in: C.G. Langton (Ed.). Artifial
  Life: An Overview. MIT Press 1995.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad94.artlife2.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1994b) Computation Is Just Interpretable Symbol Manipulation: Cognition Isn't. Special
  Issue on "What Is Computation" Minds and Machines 4:379-390
  ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad94.computation.cognition.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1995b) Why and How We Are Not Zombies. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1:
  164-167. http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad95.zombies.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1996) The Origin of Words: A Psychophysical Hypothesis In Velichkovsky B &
  Rumbaugh, D. (Eds.) "Communicating Meaning: Evolution and Development of Language. NJ:
  Erlbaum: pp 27-44. http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad96.word.origin.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (2000) Turing Indistinguishability and the Blind Watchmaker. In: Mulhauser, G. (ed.)
  "Evolving Consciousness" Amsterdam: John Benjamins (in press)
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad98.turing.evol.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (2001) Turing on Reverse-Engineering the Mind. Journal of Logic, Language, and
  Information (JoLLI) special issue on "Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence" (in press)
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.turing.html 
  
  Harnad, S. Hanson, S.J. & Lubin, J. (1995) Learned Categorical Perception in Neural Nets:
  Implications for Symbol Grounding. In: V. Honavar & L. Uhr (eds) Symbol Processors and
  Connectionist Network Models in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Modelling: Steps Toward
  Principled Integration. Academic Press. pp. 191-206.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad95.cpnets.html 
  
  Harnad, S., Steklis, H. D. & Lancaster, J. B. (eds.) (1976) Origins and Evolution of Language and
  Speech. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280. 
  
  Hayes, P., Harnad, S., Perlis, D. & Block, N. (1992) Virtual Symposium on Virtual Mind. Minds and
  Machines 2: 217-238.
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad92.virtualmind.html 
  
  Heyes, C. M. (1998). Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):
  101-134. http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.heyes.html 
  
  Hexter, J. H. (1979) Reappraisals in History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  
  Lucas, J. R. (1961) Minds, machines and Goedel. Philosophy 36: 112-117.
  http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/abs/phil/199807022 
  
  Lucas, M.M. & Hayes, P.J. (Eds.) (1982) Proceedings of the Cognitive Curriculum Conference.
  University of Rochester. 
  
  Newell, A. (1980) Physical Symbol Systems. Cognitive Science 4: 135 - 83. 
  
  Luria, A. R. (1972) The Man with a Shattered World. NY: Basic Books 
  
  Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. 1978. "Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?" Behavioral &
  Brain Sciences 1: 515-526. 
  
  Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1980) Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science.
  Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 111-169. 
  
  Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984) Computation and cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT/Bradford 
  
  Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.) (1987) The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence.
  Norwood NJ: Ablex 
  
  Searle, John. R. (1980a) Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417-457
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.searle2.html 
  
  Searle, John. R. (1980b) Intrinsic Intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 
  
  Searle, John. R. (1982) The Chinese Room Revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5: 
  
  Searle, John R. (1984) Minds, brains, and science / John Searle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
  University Press. 
  
  Searle, John. R. (1987) Minds and Brains without Programs," Mindwaves, C. Blakemore & S.
  Greenfield (eds.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 
  
  Searle, John R. (1990a) Explanatory inversion and cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  13: 585-595. 
  
  Searle, John. R. (1990b) Is the Brain's Mind a Computer Program?", Scientific American, January
  1990. 
  
  Steklis, H.D. & Harnad, S. (1976) From hand to mouth: Some critical stages in the evolution of
  language. In: Harnad et al. 1976, 445 - 455. 
  
  Turing, A.M. (1950) Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 49 433-460 [Reprinted in Minds
  and machines. A. Anderson (ed.), Engelwood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall, 1964.]
  http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/abs/comp/199807017 
  
  Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan 
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:39:09
subjects:
  - cog-psy
  - comp-sci-art-intel
  - comp-sci-robot
  - phil-mind
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?
type: bookchapter
userid: 63
volume: ~