<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sword="http://purl.org/net/sword/">
  <link rel="self" href="http://cogprints.org/cgi/export/eprint/1625/Atom/cogprints-eprint-1625.xml"/>
  <link rel="edit" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/1625"/>
  <link rel="edit-media" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/1625/contents"/>
  <link rel="contents" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/1625/contents"/>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/1625"/>
  <published>2001-06-19Z</published>
  <updated>2011-03-11T08:54:43Z</updated>
  <id>http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/1625</id>
  <category term="confpaper" label="Conference Paper" scheme="http://cogprints.org/data/eprint/type"/>
  <category term="archive" label="Live Archive" scheme="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0/eprint/eprint_status"/>
  <link rel="http://purl.org/net/sword/terms/statement" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/1625"/>
  <sword:state href="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0/eprint/eprint_status/archive"/>
  <sword:stateDescription>This item is in the repository with the URL: http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/1625</sword:stateDescription>
  <sword:originalDeposit href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/1625">
    <sword:depositedOn>2001-06-19Z</sword:depositedOn>
  </sword:originalDeposit>
  <title type="xhtml">There Is Only One Mind/Body Problem</title>
  <summary type="xhtml">In our century a Frege/Brentano wedge has gradually been driven into the mind/body
problem so deeply that it appears to have split it into two: The problem of "qualia" and the problem of
"intentionality." Both problems use similar intuition pumps: For qualia, we imagine a robot that is
indistinguishable from us in every objective respect, but it lacks subjective experiences; it is mindless.
For intentionality, we again imagine a robot that is indistinguishable from us in every objective respect
but its "thoughts" lack "aboutness"; they are meaningless. I will try to show that there is a way to
re-unify the mind/body problem by grounding the "language of thought" (symbols) in our perceptual
categorization capacity. The model is bottom-up and hybrid symbolic/nonsymbolic. 
</summary>
  <author>
    <name>Stevan Harnad</name>
    <email/>
  </author>
</entry>