@misc{cogprints1649,
          volume = {11},
          number = {78},
           title = {The Convergence Argument in Mind-Modelling: Scaling Up from Toyland to the Total Turing Test},
          author = {Stevan Harnad},
            year = {2000},
         journal = {Psycoloquy},
        keywords = {artificial intelligence, behaviorism, cognitive science, computationalism, Fodor, functionalism, Searle, Turing Machine,
Turing Test. },
             url = {http://cogprints.org/1649/},
        abstract = {The Turing Test is just a methodological constraint forcing us to scale up to an organisms' full functional
     capacity. This is still just an epistemic matter, not an ontic one. Even a candidate in which we have successfully
     reverse-engineered all human capacities is not guaranteed to have a mind. The right level of convergence,
     however, is total robotic capacity; symbolic capacity alone (the standard Turing Test) is underdetermined,
     whereas full neurosimilitude is overdetermined. }
}

<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js'></script>
<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/google-analytics.js'></script>