---
abstract: |
Semantico-Phonetic Form: A Unitarianist Grammar
Ahmad R. Lotfi
Azad University at Esfahan (IRAN)
ABSTRACT
Semantico-Phonetic Form is a unitarianist theory of language in two different
but inter-related senses: first, it assumes that the Conceptual-Intentional and
Articulatory-Perceptual systems (responsible for semantic and phonetic
interpretations respectively) access the data at one and the same level of inter-
pretation; hence a single interface level--Semantico-Phonetic Form, SPF.
Second, it is unitarianist in that (although it is still a formalist theory of language)
it potentially permits the incorporation of both formalist and functionalist explana-
tions in its formulation of the architecture of language.
Within the framework of Semantico-Phonetic Form, and as an alternative proposal
to Chomsky's minimalist thesis of movement, the Pooled Features Hypothesis pro-
poses that "movement" is the consequence of the way in which the language faculty
is organised (rather than a simple "imperfection" of language). The computational
system CHL for human language is considered to be economical in its selection of
formal features from the lexicon so that if two LIs (to be introduced in the same
derivation) happen to have some identical formal feature in common, the feature is
selected only once but shared by the syntactic objects in the derivation. It follows
that the objects in question must be as local in their relations as possible. The local-
ity of relations as such, which is due to economy considerations, results in some kind
of (bare) phrase structure with pooled features labelling the structural tree nodes that
dominate the syntactic objects. Pooled features, in a sense, are structurally interpreted.
Other features, i.e. those not pooled, will be interpreted at SPF.
KEY WORDS:
bare phrase structure, economy, faculty of language,
feature checking, feature sharing, formal features,
imperfections, lexicon, logical forms, minimalist syntax,
Semantico-Phonetic Form, strength, unitarianist theory
altloc: []
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Lotfi
given: Ahmad Reza
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 2000
date_type: published
datestamp: 2001-07-04
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/16/69
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 1669
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_plain.png;/1669/1/spf.txt|/style/images/fileicons/other.png;/1669/2/Semant.DOC
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: ~
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: |-
semantico-phonetic form, LF, interface levels, minimalism,
minimalist program, interpretation, generative linguistics
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:44
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: ~
pubdom: FALSE
publication: ~
publisher: ~
refereed: FALSE
referencetext: |
References
Aarons, D., B. Bahan, J. Kegl, and C. Neidle. (1992). Clausal Struc-
ture and a Tier for Grammatical Marking in ASL. Nordic Journal
of Linguistics 15:103-142.
Allott, R. (1994). Gestural Equivalence (Equivalents) of Language.
Berkeley, [http://www.percep.demon.co.uk/index.htm].
Barss, A. (1986). Chains and Anaphoric Dependence: On Reconstruction
and its Implications. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Boskovic, Z. (1998). On the Interpretation of Multiple Questions.
Chomsky Celebration Website, [http://mitpress.mit.edu/\
celebration].
Brody, M. (1995). Lexico-Logical Form: A Radically Minimalist Theory.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brody, M. (1997). Perfect Chains. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of
Generative Syntax, ed. L. Haegeman. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Browne, W. (1970). More on Definiteness Markers: Interrogatives in
Persian. Linguistic Inquiry 1:359-363.
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. (1989). Gestural Structures and Phonolo-
gical Patterns. Status Report on Speech Research SR-97/98 pp.
1-23. NewHaven, Conn.:Haskins Laboratories.
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. (1991). Gestural Structures: Distinctive-
ness, Phonological Processes, and Historical Change. In Modu-
larity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception eds.
Mattingly, I. M. and M. Studdert-Kennedy.
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. (1992). Articulatory Phonology: An over-
view. Phonetica 49:155-180.
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning
and Form. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Calvin, W. and D. Bickerton. (2000). Lingua ex Machina: Reconciling
Darwin and Chomsky with the Human Brain. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht:
Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional
Papers in Linguistics 15, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Lin-
guistics 18, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Collins, A. M.& M. R. Quillian (1969). Retrieval Time from Semantic
Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8.
240-247.
Conrad, C. (1972). Cognitive Economy in Semantic Memory. Journal of
Experimental Psychology 92 . 149-154.
Estes, W. K. (1986). Array Models for Category Learning. Cognitive
Psychology 18. 500-549.
Fox, D. and U. Sauerland. (1997). Illusive Scope of Universal
Quantifiers, [http://web.mit.edu/afs/athena.mit.edu/user/s\
/a/sauerlan/www/Scope_Illusions.html].
Givon, T. (1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Givon, T. (1984). Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction.
Amesterdam: Benjamins.
Givon, T. (1995). Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Gluck, M. A. (1991). Stimulus Generalization and Representation in
Adaptive Network Models of Category Learning. Psychological
Science 2. 50-55.
Gould, S.J. (1991). Exaptation: A Crucial Tool for Evolutionary Psycho-
logy. Journal of Social Issues 47, 43-65.
Grohmann, K. (1999). German is a Multiple Wh-Fronting Language!
Colloque de syntaxe et semantique a Paris 3.
Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory.
Basil Blackwell.
Hagstrom, P. (1998). Decomposing Questions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Haiman, J. (1985). Natural Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Hale, K. (1998). Conflicting Truths. In Functionalism and Formalism in
Linguistics, eds. M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M.
Noonan, and K. Wheatley. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language Structure and Language Function.
In New Horizons in Linguistics, ed. J. Lyons. Baltimore:
Penguin Books.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language.
London: Edward Arnolds.
Hawkins, J. A. (1989). Competence and Performance in the Explanation of
Language Universals. In Essays on Grammatical Theory and
Universal Grammar, eds. D. Arnold, M. Atkinson, J. Durand,
C. Grover, and L. Sadler. Oxford University Press.
Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jesperson, O. (1993). Progress in Language with Special Reference to
English. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Kaiser, L. (1998). Representing the Structure-Discourse Iconicity of
the Japanese Post-Verbal Construction. In Functionalism and
Formalism in Linguistics, eds. M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F.
Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Karimi, S. (1989). Aspects of Persian Syntax, Specificity, and the
Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of
Washington.
Karimi, S. (1990). Obliqueness, Specificity, and Discourse Functions:
Ra in Persian. Linguistic Analysis 20:139-191.
Kendon, A. (1972). Some Relationships between Body Motion and Speech: An
Analysis of one example. In Siegman, Aron Wolfe and Benjamin
Pope eds. Studies in Dyadic Communication. New York: Pergamon.
Kendon, A. (1991). Revisiting the Gesture Theory of Language Origins.
Paper for LOS Meeting, De Kalb, Illinois.
Komatsu, L. K. (1994). Experimenting with the Mind: Readings in
Cognitive Psychology. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing
Company.
Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An Exemplar-Based Connectionist Model
of Category Learning. Psychological Review 99. 22-44.
Kuno, S. (1973). The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Kuno, S. (1978). Japanese: A Characteristic OV Language. In Syntactic
Typology, ed. W. Lehmann. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Liberman, A. M. (1993). Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech
Research 113:1-32.
Lindblom, B., S. Guion, S. Hura, S. Moon, and R. Willerman. (1995).
Is Sound Change Adaptive? Revista di Linguistica 7:5-37.
Lotfi, A. R. (to appear). Minimalist Program Revisited: Chomsky's
Strength to Trigger Movement. Proceedings of the 34th Col-
loquium of Linguistics.
May, R. (1985). Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
May, R. (1991). Syntax, Semantics, and Logical Form. In The Chomskyan
Turn, ed. A. Kasher. Oxford: Blackwell.
McClelland, J. L. & D. E. Rumelhart (1985). Distributed Memory and
the Representation of General and Specific Information. Journal
of Experimental Psychology 114. 159-188.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meinunger, A. (1998). Topicality and Agreement. In Functionalism and
Formalism in Linguistics, eds. M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F.
Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Nettle, D. (1998). Functionalism and Its Difficulties in Biology and
Linguistics. In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics,
eds. M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K.
Wheatley. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Newmeyer, F. (1998a). Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Newmeyer, F. (1998b). Some Remarks on the Functionalist-Formalist
Controversy in Linguistics. In Functionalism and Formalism in
Linguistics, eds. M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M.
Noonan, and K. Wheatley. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Pesetsky, D. (1989). Language-Particular Processes and the Earliness
Principle. Ms. MIT.
Place, U. T. (2000). The role of the hand in the evolution of language.
Psycoloquy 11(007), [http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/n\
ewpsy?11.007].
Rips, L. J., E. J. Shoben, & E. E. Smith (1973). Semantic Distance and
the Verification of Semantic Relations. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior 12. 1-20.
Roberts, I. and A. Roussou. ms. Interface Interpretation. University of
Stuttgart.
Schyns, P. G. (1991). A Modular Neural Network Model of Concept
Acquisition. Cognitive Science 15 . 461-508.
Shanks, D. R. (1991). Categorization by a Connectionist Network. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17.
433-443.
Uriagereka, J. (1998). Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist
Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vallduvi, E. (1992). The Informational Component. New York: Garland.
Wilbur, R. (1998). A Functional Journey with a Formal Ending: What do
Brow Raises Do in American Sign Language? In Functionalism and
Formalism in Linguistics, eds. M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F.
Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Zubizarreta, M.L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:39:31
subjects:
- ling-syntax
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: 'Semantico-Phonetic Form: A Unitarianist Grammar'
type: preprint
userid: 1942
volume: ~