?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=E-Knowledge%3A+Freeing+the+Refereed+Journal+Corpus+Online.&rft.creator=Harnad%2C+Stevan&rft.subject=Archives&rft.subject=Copyright&rft.subject=Economics&rft.subject=Peer+Review&rft.description=The+author+of+this+paper+has+been+advocating+for+some+time+that+online+public+self-archiving+of+the+refereed+journal+literature++be+introduced+without+delay.+Indeed+he+sees+it+as+inevitable+in+all+disciplines+within+a+very+short+time+(and+as+optimal+for+research+and+researchers).+He+also+argues+that+it+can+be+achieved+without+compromising+the+peer+reviewed+journal+literature+in+any+way.+%0A%0AWhat+follows+here+is+a+point-by-point+critique+of+two+prominent+prior+published+critiques+(appearing+in+Science+and+the+New+England+Journal+of+Medicine)+of+a+still+earlier+proposal++along+the+lines+championed+here%2C+by+the+former+Director+of+the+U.S.+National+Institutes+of+Health+(NIH)%2C+Harold+Varmus.+The+Varmus+proposal+was+to+establish+a+free+archive+for+the+biomedical+literature+called+%22E-Biomed%22+(since+renamed+%22PubMed+Central%22+and+currently+being+implemented+along+somewhat+different+lines).++The+two+critiques+of+the+Varmus+proposal+++were+by+Floyd+Bloom%2C+Editor+of+Science%2C+and+by+Arnold+Relman%2C+Editor+of+the+New+England+Journal+of+Medicine.+Both+critiques+are+replied+to+and+critiqued+in+turn+in+quote%2Fcommentary+format+below.&rft.date=2000&rft.type=Journal+(Paginated)&rft.type=NonPeerReviewed&rft.format=text%2Fhtml&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1701%2F1%2Fharnad00.scinejm.htm&rft.identifier=++Harnad%2C+Stevan++(2000)+E-Knowledge%3A+Freeing+the+Refereed+Journal+Corpus+Online.++%5BJournal+(Paginated)%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1701%2F