---
abstract: |-
  Under the editorship of Franz Ingelfinger, the New England Journal of Medicine adopted a policy of declining to referee or
  publish research that had been previously published or publicised elsewhere. Other biomedical journals, as well as
  broad-spectrum journals such as Science, have since adopted this "Ingelfinger rule". The four rationales underlying this rule, formulated in the Gutenberg era, are examined here to see which of them are still valid post-Gutenberg.
altloc:
  - http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.lancet.htm
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
  - family: Harnad
    given: Stevan
    honourific: ''
    lineage: ''
date: 2000-12
date_type: published
datestamp: 2001-07-18
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/17/03
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 1703
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/1703/1/harnad00.lancet.htm
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'electronic publishing, Ingelfinger Rule, Copyright, publication embargo, self-archiving'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:45
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: s16
pubdom: FALSE
publication: The Lancet
publisher: ~
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: |-2
  
  Angell, M. & Kassirer, J.P. (1991) The Ingelfinger Rule Revisited. 
  New England Journal of Medicine 325(19): 1371-1373. 
  http://www.nejm.org/content/1991/0325/0019/1371.asp 
  
  Bachrach, S., Berry, S.R., Blume, M., von Foerster, T., Fowler, A., 
  Ginsparg, P., Heller, S., Kestner, N., Odlyzko, A., Okerson, 
  A., Wigington, R., & Moffat, A. (1998) Intellectual Property: Who Should 
  Own Scientific Papers? Science 281 (5382): 
  1459-1460. September 4 1998. 
  http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5382/1459 
  
  Bloom, F. (1998) The Rightness of Copyright [Editorial] Science 
  281 (5382): 1451. September 4 1998. 
  http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/281/5382/1451 
  
  Bloom,Floyd E.  (1999) Just a Minute, Please [Editorial] Science 285 
  (5425) p. 197. 
  http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/285/5425/197 
  
  Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Hall, W. & Harnad, S. (2000) A usage based 
  analysis of CoRR [A commentary on "CoRR: a Computing Research 
  Repository" by Joseph Y. Halpern] ACM SIGDOC Journal of Computer 
  Documentation. May 2000. 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.halpern.htm 
  
  Harnad, S. (ed.) (1982) Peer commentary on peer review: A case study in 
  scientific quality control, New York: Cambridge University Press. 
  
  Harnad, S. (1986) Policing the Paper Chase. (Review of S. Lock, A 
  difficult balance: Peer review in biomedical publication.) 
  Nature 322: 24 - 5. 
  
  Harnad, S. (1990) Scholarly Skywriting and the Prepublication Continuum 
  of Scientific Inquiry. Psychological Science 1: 342 - 343 (reprinted in 
  Current Contents 45: 9-13, November 11 1991). 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad90.skywriting.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1991/1992/1994) Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: The Fourth 
  Revolution in the Means of Production of Knowledge. Public-Access 
  Computer Systems Review 2 (1): 39 - 53 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad91.postgutenberg.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1995) Universal FTP Archives for Esoteric Science and 
  Scholarship:  A Subversive Proposal. In: Ann Okerson & James O'Donnell 
  (Eds.) Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads; A Subversive Proposal for 
  Electronic Publishing. Washington, DC., Association of Research 
  Libraries, June 1995. 
  http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/toc.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1996) Implementing Peer Review on the Net: 
  Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals. In: 
  Peek, R. & Newby, G. (Eds.) Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic 
  Frontier.  Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Pp. 103-118. 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad96.peer.review.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1998/1997) Learned Inquiry and the Net: 
  The Role of Peer Review, Peer Commentary and Copyright. 
  Learned Publishing 4(11): 283-292 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad98.toronto.learnedpub.html 
  http://citd.scar.utoronto.ca/EPub/talks/Harnad_Snider.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1998) For Whom the Gate Tolls? Free the Online-Only 
  Refereed Literature. American Scientist Forum. 
  http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september-forum.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1998) On-Line Journals and Financial Fire-Walls. 
  Nature 395(6698): 127-128. 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/nature.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (1998/2000) The invisible hand of peer review. Nature [online] 
  (5 Nov. 1998) and in Exploit Interactive 5 (2000) 
  http://helix.nature.com/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html 
  http://www.exploit-lib.org/issue5/peer-review/ 
  
  Harnad, S. (1999) Free at Last: The Future of Peer-Reviewed Journals. 
  D-Lib Magazine 5(12) December 1999 
  http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html 
  
  Harnad, S. (2000) E-Knowledge: Freeing the Refereed Journal Corpus 
  Online. Computer Law & Security Report 16(2) 
  78-87. [Rebuttal to Bloom Editorial in Science and Relman Editorial in 
  New England Journalof Medicine] 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.scinejm.htm 
  http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/eletters/285/5425/197#EL12 
  
  Hitchcock, S. Carr, L., Jiao, Z., Bergmark, D., Hall, W., Lagoze, C. & 
  Harnad, S. (2000) Developing services for open eprint archives: 
  globalisation, integration and the impact of links. Proceedings of the 
  5th ACM Conference on Digital Libraries. San Antonio Texas June 2000. 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.acm.htm 
  
  Harnad, S., Varian, H. & Parks, R. (2000) Academic publishing in the 
  online era: What Will Be For-Fee And What Will Be For-FRee? 
  Culture Machine 2 (Online Journal) 
  http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/Varian/new1.htm 
  http://culturemachine.tees.ac.uk/frm_f1.htm 
  
  Ingelfinger, F. (1969) Definition of "sole contribution." 
  New England Journal of Medicine 
  281: 676-7. 
  
  Kassirer, J.P. & Angell, M. (1995) The Internet and the Journal. 
  New England Journal of Medicine 332 (25) 1709-1710. 
  http://www.nejm.org/content/1995/0332/0025/1709.asp 
  
  Kassirer, J.P. (1999) Posting Presentations at Medical Meetings on the 
  Internet. 
  New England Journal of Medicine 340(10): 803. 
  http://www.nejm.org/content/1999/0340/0010/0803.asp 
  
  Relman, A.S. (1999) The NIH "E-biomed" Proposal -- A Potential Threat to 
  the Evaluation and Orderly Dissemination of New Clinical Studies. 
  New England Journal of Medicine 340(23): 1828. 
  http://www.nejm.org/content/1999/0340/0023/1828.asp 
  
  Relman A.S. (1988) More on the Ingelfinger Rule. 
  New England Journal of Medicine 318: 1125-6. 
  
  Relman, A.S. (1981) The Ingelfinger Rule. 
  New England Journal of Medicine 305: 824-6. 
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:39:49
subjects:
  - economics
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: 'Ingelfinger Over-Ruled: The Role of the Web in the Future of Refereed Medical Journal Publishing'
type: journalp
userid: 63
volume: 256