This site has been permanently archived. This is a static copy provided by the University of Southampton.

TY - GEN ID - cogprints1761 UR - http://cogprints.org/1761/ A1 - Brown, Steven Ravett TI - Peirce, Searle, and the Chinese Room Argument Y1 - 2001/// N2 - Whether human thinking can be formalized and whether machines can think in a human sense are questions that have been addressed since the Renaissance. I will employ arguments from both a modern critic, John Searle, and from one present at the inception of the field, Charles Peirce, and another inductive argument, all of which conclude that digital computers cannot achieve human-like understanding. Searle approaches the problem from the standpoint of traditional analytic philosophy. Peirce would have radically disagreed with Searle�s analysis, but he ultimately arrives at the same conclusion. Given this diversity of arguments against the Artificial Intelligence (AI) project, it would seem its ultimate goal is futile, despite the computer�s amazing achievements. However, I will show that those arguments themselves imply a direction for AI research which seems fruitful and which is in fact being pursued, although it is not in the mainstream of that field. AV - public ER -