---
abstract: 'The idea that there are any large-scale trends in the evolution of biological organisms is highly controversial. It is commonly believed, for example, that there is a large-scale trend in evolution towards increasing complexity, but empirical and theoretical arguments undermine this belief. Natural selection results in organisms that are well adapted to their local environments, but it is not clear how local adaptation can produce a global trend. In this paper, I present a simple computational model, in which local adaptation to a randomly changing environment results in a global trend towards increasing evolutionary versatility. In this model, for evolutionary versatility to increase without bound, the environment must be highly dynamic. The model also shows that unbounded evolutionary versatility implies an accelerating evolutionary pace. I believe that unbounded increase in evolutionary versatility is a large-scale trend in evolution. I discuss some of the testable predictions about organismal evolution that are suggested by the model. '
altloc:
- http://extractor.iit.nrc.ca/reports/alife2000.html
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Turney
given: Peter
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 2000
date_type: published
datestamp: 2001-09-13
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/17/99
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 1799
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_postscript.png;/1799/1/ALife2000.ps|/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/1799/5/ALife2000.pdf
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'evolutionary trends, evolutionary progress, large-scale trends, evolutionary versatility, evolvability, Baldwin effect.'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:47
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: 2
pagerange: 109-128
pubdom: FALSE
publication: Artificial Life
publisher: MIT Press
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: |
1. Aboitiz, F. (1991). Lineage selection and the capacity to evolve. Medical Hypotheses,
36, 155-156.
2. Altenberg, L. (1994). The evolution of evolvability in genetic programming. In:
Advances in Genetic Programming, K. E. Kinnear Jr., (ed.). MIT Press.
3. Anderson, R.W. (1995). Learning and evolution: A quantitative genetics approach. Jour-nal
of Theoretical Biology, 175, 89-101.
4. Ayala F.J. (1974). The concept of biological progress. In Studies in the Philosophy of
Biology, ed. F.J. Ayala, T. Dobzhansky,19:339-55. New York: Macmillan.
5. Ayala F.J. (1988). Can “progress” be defined as a biological concept? In Evolutionary
Progress, ed. M Nitecki, pp. 75-96. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Bäch, T. (1992). Self-adaptation in genetic algorithms. In F.J. Varela and P. Bourgine
(eds.), Towards a Practice of Autonomous Systems. MIT Press, pp. 263-271.
7. Baldwin, J.M. (1896). A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist, 30, 441-451.
8. Bedau, M.A., and Seymour, R. (1995). Adaptation of mutation rates in a simple model
of evolution. Complexity International, 2.
9. Blickle, T., and Thiele, L. (1995). A Comparison of Selection Schemes used in Genetic
Algorithms. Technical Report No. 11. Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092 Zurich: Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Computer Engineering and Communications
Networks Lab (TIK).
10. Blickle, T., and Thiele, L. (1995). A mathematical analysis of tournament selection, In
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, ICGA-95,
L.J. Eshelman, Ed., Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, pp. 9-16.
11. Davis, L. (1989). Adapting operator probabilities in genetic search. Proceedings of the
Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, ICGA-89, Morgan Kaufmann,
San Mateo, CA, pp. 61-69.
12. Dawkins, R. (1989). The evolution of evolvability. In: Artificial Life, C. Langton, (ed.).
Addison-Wesley.
13. Dawkins, R. (1996). Climbing Mount Improbable. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.
14. Fogel, D.B., Fogel, L.J., and Atmar, J.W. (1991). Meta-evolutionary programming. In
R.R. Chen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Sys-tems,
and Computers, pp. 540-545, California: Maple Press.
15. Gilinsky, N.L., and Good, I.J. (1991). Probabilities of origination, persistence, and
extinction of families of marine invertebrate life. Paleobiology, 17, 145-166.
16. Gould S.J. (1988). Trends as changes in variance: A new slant on progress and direc-tionality
in evolution. Journal of Paleontology, 62, 319-29.
17. Gould S.J. (1997). Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. New
York: Harmony.
18. Hinton, G.E., and Nowlan, S.J. (1987). How learning can guide evolution. Complex Sys-tems,
1, 495-502.
19. Lewin, R. (1985). Red Queen runs into trouble? Science, 227, 399-400.
20. McShea, D.W. (1996). Metazoan complexity and evolution: Is there a trend? Evolution,
50, 477-492.
21. McShea, D.W. (1998). Possible largest-scale trends in organismal evolution: Eight “Live
Hypotheses”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 293-318.
22. Nitecki, M.H. (1988). Evolutionary Progress. Edited collection. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
23. Raup, D.M. (1975). Taxonomic survivorship curves and Van Valen's Law. Paleobiology,
1, 82-86.
24. Riedl, R. (1977). A systems-analytical approach to macro-evolutionary phenomena.
Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 351-370.
25. Riedl, R. (1978). Order in Living Organisms: A Systems Analysis of Evolution. Trans-lated
by R.P.S. Jefferies. Translation of Die Ordnung Des Lebendigen. New York: Wiley.
26. Ruse, M. (1996). Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology.
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
27. Simon, H.A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American
Philosophical Society, 106, 467-482.
28. Syswerda, G. (1989). Uniform crossover in genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the Third
International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA-89), pp. 2-9. California: Mor-gan
Kaufmann.
29. Syswerda, G. (1991). A study of reproduction in generational and steady-state genetic
algorithms. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms. G. Rawlins, editor. Morgan Kaufmann.
pp. 94-101.
30. Turney, P.D. (1989). The architecture of complexity: A new blueprint. Synthese, 79,
515-542.
31. Turney, P.D. (1996). How to shift bias: Lessons from the Baldwin effect. Evolutionary
Computation, 4, 271-295.
32. Turney, P.D. (1999). Increasing evolvability considered as a large-scale trend in evolu-tion.
In A. Wu, ed., Proceedings of 1999 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Con-ference
Workshop Program (GECCO-99 Workshop on Evolvability), pp. 43-46.
33. Van Valen, L. (1973). A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1-30.
34. Vermeij, G.J. (1970). Adaptive versatility and skeleton construction. American Natural-ist,
104, 253-260.
35. Vermeij, G.J. (1971). Gastropod evolution and morphological diversity in relation to
shell geometry. Journal of Zoology, 163, 15-23.
36. Vermeij, G.J. (1973). Biological versatility and earth history. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70, 1936-1938.
37. Vermeij, G.J. (1974). Adaptation, versatility, and evolution. Systematic Zoology, 22,
466-477.
38. Wagner, G.P. and Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolv-ability.
Evolution, 50, 967-976.
39. Whitley, D., and Kauth, J. (1988). GENITOR: A different genetic algorithm. Proceed-ings
of the Rocky Mountain Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Denver, CO. pp. 118-
130.
40. Whitley, D. (1989). The GENITOR algorithm and selective pressure. Proceedings of the
Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA-89), pp. 116-121. Califor-nia:
Morgan Kaufmann.
41. Whitley, D., Dominic, S., Das, R., and Anderson, C.W. (1993). Genetic reinforcement
learning for neurocontrol problems. Machine Learning, 13, 259-284.
42. Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. New Jersey: Princeton Uni-versity
Press.
43. Wolpert, D.H., and Macready, W.G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization.
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1, 67-82.
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 14
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:40:45
subjects:
- bio-evo
- bio-theory
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: A simple model of unbounded evolutionary versatility as a largest-scale trend in organismal evolution
type: journalp
userid: 2175
volume: 6