CogprintsDistinguishing kinds of prior dominance and subordination experiences in male Green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri).Jacques P.BeaugrandauthorClaudeGouletauthorIn experiments, there are usually two general ways of obtaining dominants and subordinates to test for the effect of recent experience upon ulterior behaviour and dominance. One is to “impose” such an experience on the contestants by a priori deciding which individual of the pair will become the dominant and which will become the subordinate through the use of rigged contests. The second technique is to let contestants “self-select” the winner and loser by waiting for the spontaneous outcome of dyadic encounters between two usually well matched opponents. These two techniques of obtaining dominants and subordinates probably represent extreme cases on a single continuum of investment made by animals to settle dominance. To test this, we compared dominants and subordinates obtained from these two techniques in Xiphophorus fish males. It was found that pairs obtained through rigged contests (R) were much more aggressive in subsequent encounters than pairs in which the dominant and subordinate could self-select (S). They recuperated more rapidly from handling, initiated contact earlier, took more time to assess each other, and fought for a longer period of time. Prior-winners and prior-losers of the R condition more frequently relied on aggressive behaviour during contest than that of the S condition. As a consequence, prior-winners and prior-losers of the R condition won equally the subsequent contest. On the contrary, prior-winners of the S condition defeated their prior-loser opponent in a majority of cases. These results can be tentatively explained by the following principle: winning or losing against a well matched opponent would leave more “experience” than winning over a much weaker opponent, or losing to a much stronger one. This reinforces the hypothesis that prior-experiences are not qualitative states but come in various degrees. Animal BehaviorEthology2000ElsevierJournal (Paginated)

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Cogprints the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Cogprints does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Cogprints) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.