?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=Learning+Logographies+and+Alphabetic+Codes&rft.creator=Muter%2C+Paul&rft.creator=Johns%2C+Elizabeth+E.&rft.subject=Applied+Cognitive+Psychology&rft.subject=Cognitive+Psychology&rft.subject=Learnability&rft.subject=Psycholinguistics&rft.description=In+three+experiments%2C+literate+English-speaking+adults+learned+either+to+identify+or+to+extract+meaning+from+either+logographs+(Blissymbols+or+Chinese+characters)+or+English+words+written+in+an+unfamiliar+alphabetic+code.+Performance+was+substantially+and+reliably+better+in+the+logographic+conditions+than+in+the+alphabetic+conditions.+Vocabulary+sized+ranged+from+30+to+240+words+per+condition.+In+a+fourth+experiment%2C+learning+was+slower+with+inconsistent+mapping+of+graphemes+to+phonemes+(similar+to+English)+than+with+consistent+mapping.+These+results+indicate+that%2C+under+a+reasonably+wide+range+of+conditions%2C+logographic+writing+systems+may+be+easier+to+learn+to+read+than+alphabetic+writing+systems.&rft.publisher=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Ltd.&rft.date=1985&rft.type=Journal+(Paginated)&rft.type=PeerReviewed&rft.format=text%2Fhtml&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1992%2F1%2FAbs1985.htm&rft.identifier=++Muter%2C+Paul+and+Johns%2C+Elizabeth+E.++(1985)+Learning+Logographies+and+Alphabetic+Codes.++%5BJournal+(Paginated)%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1992%2F