@misc{cogprints2004, volume = {19}, number = {3}, month = {September}, author = {Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson}, editor = {Stevan Harnad}, title = {Fodor's Frame Problem and Relevance Theory (reply to Chiappe \& Kukla)}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, year = {1996}, journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences}, pages = {530--532}, keywords = {dan sperber, cognition, communication, culture, frame problem, jerry fodor, philosophy of mind, pragmatics, relevance, relevance theory"}, url = {http://cogprints.org/2004/}, abstract = {Chiappe and Kukla argue that relevance theory fails to solve the frame problem as defined by Fodor. They are right. They are wrong, however, to take Fodor?s frame problem too seriously. Fodor?s concerns, on the other hand, even though they are wrongly framed, are worth addressing. We argue that Relevance thoery helps address them.} }