?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=Fodor's+Frame+Problem+and+Relevance+Theory+(reply+to+Chiappe+%26+Kukla)&rft.creator=Sperber%2C+Dan&rft.creator=Wilson%2C+Deirdre&rft.subject=Cognitive+Psychology&rft.subject=Pragmatics&rft.subject=Philosophy+of+Mind&rft.description=Chiappe+and+Kukla+argue+that+relevance+theory+fails+to+solve+the+frame+problem+as+defined+by+Fodor.+They+are+right.+They+are+wrong%2C+however%2C+to+take+Fodor%C2%92s+frame+problem+too+seriously.+Fodor%C2%92s+concerns%2C+on+the+other+hand%2C+even+though+they+are+wrongly+framed%2C+are+worth+addressing.+We+argue+that+Relevance+thoery+helps+address+them.&rft.publisher=Cambridge+University+Press&rft.contributor=Harnad%2C+Stevan&rft.date=1996-09&rft.type=Journal+(Paginated)&rft.type=PeerReviewed&rft.format=text%2Fhtml&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F2004%2F1%2Fframe.htm&rft.identifier=++Sperber%2C+Dan+and+Wilson%2C+Deirdre++(1996)+Fodor's+Frame+Problem+and+Relevance+Theory+(reply+to+Chiappe+%26+Kukla).++%5BJournal+(Paginated)%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F2004%2F