TY  - GEN
ID  - cogprints2004
UR  - http://cogprints.org/2004/
A1  - Sperber, Dan
A1  - Wilson, Deirdre
Y1  - 1996/09//
N2  - Chiappe and Kukla argue that relevance theory fails to solve the frame problem as defined by Fodor. They are right. They are wrong, however, to take Fodor’s frame problem too seriously. Fodor’s concerns, on the other hand, even though they are wrongly framed, are worth addressing. We argue that Relevance thoery helps address them.
PB  - Cambridge University Press
KW  - dan sperber
KW  -  cognition
KW  -  communication
KW  -  culture
KW  -  frame problem
KW  -  jerry fodor
KW  -  philosophy of mind
KW  -  pragmatics
KW  -  relevance
KW  -  relevance theory"
TI  - Fodor's Frame Problem and Relevance Theory (reply to Chiappe & Kukla)
SP  - 530
AV  - public
EP  - 532
ER  -

<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js'></script>
<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/google-analytics.js'></script>