---
abstract: |
  Line Roberts et al., in "Building A "GenBank" of the Published Literature"
  (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/291/5512/2318a), Sequeira et al., in "PubMed Central decides to decentralize"
  (http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/pubmed.html) announce a new policy from PubMedCentral (PMC). PMC
  already accepts contents from publishers who are only willing to free them 6-12 months after publication. Now PMC is ready
  to accept just the metadata from those publishers, linking to their toll-gated websites, if they agree to give away their contents
  on their own websites 6-12 months after publication. Free access to refereed research a year after publication is better then no access, but it's too little, too late. The details of the self-archiving alternative for freeing the entire refereed corpus now (including questions of copyright and
  embargo) are fully described in Harnad (2001) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm.
altloc:
  - http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/nature3.htm
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: |-
  Roberts et al.'s article, entitled "Science's Response: Is aGovernment Archive the Best Option?"
  (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/291/5512/2318b)
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
  - family: Harnad
    given: Stevan
    honourific: ''
    lineage: ''
date: 2001
date_type: published
datestamp: 2002-03-12
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/21/29
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 2129
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/2129/1/nature3.htm
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: unpub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'electronic publishing, peer review, embargo, self-archiving, pubmed central'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:54
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: ~
pubdom: FALSE
publication: ~
publisher: ~
refereed: FALSE
referencetext: ~
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:43:03
subjects:
  - archives
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: The Self-Archiving Alternative
type: other
userid: 63
volume: ~
<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js'></script>
<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/google-analytics.js'></script>