TY  - GEN
ID  - cogprints2293
UR  - http://cogprints.org/2293/
A1  - Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste
A1  - Politzer, Guy
A1  - Sperber, Dan
Y1  - 2002///
N2  - When is a conclusion worth deriving? We claim that a conclusion is worth deriving to the extent that it is relevant in the sense of relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1995). To support this hypothesis, we experiment with "indeterminate relational problems" where we ask participants what, if anything, follows from premises such as A is taller than B, A is taller than C. With such problems, the indeterminate response that nothing follows is common, and we explain why. We distinguish several types of determinate conclusions and show that their rate is a function of their relevance. We argue that by appropriately changing the formulation of the premises, the relevance of determinate conclusions can be increased, and the rate of indeterminate responses thereby reduced. We contrast these relevance-based predictions with predictions based on linguistic congruence.
KW  - cognition
KW  -  pragmatics
KW  -  experimental psychology of reasoning
KW  -  psycholinguistics
KW  -  relevance
KW  -  relevance theory
KW  -  relational problems
TI  - When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of indeterminate relational problems
SP  - 1
AV  - public
EP  - 20
ER  -

<script src="//archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js"></script>