@misc{cogprints267,
          editor = {Van den Broek Pick},
           title = {Filling in versus finding out: A ubiquitous confusion in cognitive science},
          author = {Daniel Dennett},
       publisher = {American Psychological Association},
            year = {1992},
         journal = {Cognition, Conception, and Methodological Issues},
             url = {http://cogprints.org/267/},
        abstract = {One of the things you learn if you read books and articles in (or about) cognitive science is that the brain does a lot of "filling in"--not filling in, but "filling in"--in scare quotes. My claim today will be that this way of talking is not a safe bit of shorthand, or an innocent bit of temporizing, but a source of deep confusion and error. The phenomena described in terms of "filling in" are real, surprising, and theoretically important, but it is a mistake to conceive of them as instances of something being filled in, for that vivid phrase always suggests too much--sometimes a little too much, but often a lot too much. Here are some examples (my boldface throughout).}
}

<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js'></script>
<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/google-analytics.js'></script>