creators_name: Dennett, Daniel C
editors_name: Akins, K.
type: bookchapter
datestamp: 1998-04-15
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:53:47
metadata_visibility: show
title: Seeing is Believing--or is it?
ispublished: pub
subjects: phil-logic
full_text_status: public
abstract: We would all like to have a good theory of perception. Such a theory would account for all the known phenomena and predict novel phenomena, explaining everything in terms of processes occurring in nervous systems in accordance with the principles and laws already established by science: the principles of optics, physics, biochemistry, and the like. Such a theory might come to exist without our ever having to answer the awkward "philosophical" question that arises:
date: 1996
date_type: published
publication: Perception - Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science
publisher: Oxford University Press
pagerange: 158-172
refereed: FALSE
citation:   Dennett, Daniel C  (1996) Seeing is Believing--or is it?  [Book Chapter]     
document_url: http://cogprints.org/284/1/seebelie.htm

<script src='//archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js'></script>