---
abstract: 'We would all like to have a good theory of perception. Such a theory would account for all the known phenomena and predict novel phenomena, explaining everything in terms of processes occurring in nervous systems in accordance with the principles and laws already established by science: the principles of optics, physics, biochemistry, and the like. Such a theory might come to exist without our ever having to answer the awkward "philosophical" question that arises:'
altloc:
- http://www.tufts.edu/as/cogstud/papers/seebelie.htm
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Dennett
given: Daniel C
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 1996
date_type: published
datestamp: 1998-04-15
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/02/84
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name:
- family: Akins
given: K.
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 284
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/284/1/seebelie.htm
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: ~
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:53:47
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: 158-172
pubdom: FALSE
publication: 'Perception - Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science'
publisher: Oxford University Press
refereed: FALSE
referencetext: ~
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:26:19
subjects:
- phil-logic
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: Seeing is Believing--or is it?
type: bookchapter
userid: 38
volume: ~