?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=Issues+in+Statistical+Inference&rft.creator=Chow%2C+Dr.+Siu+L.&rft.subject=Cognitive+Psychology&rft.subject=Philosophy+of+Science&rft.description=The+APA+Task+Force%E2%80%99s+treatment+of+research+methods+is+critically+examined.+The+present+defense+of+the+experiment+rests+on+showing+that+(a)+the+control+group+cannot+be+replaced+by+the+contrast+group%2C+(b)+experimental+psychologists+have+valid+reasons+to+use+non-randomly+selected+subjects%2C+(c)+there+is+no+evidential+support+for+the+experimenter+expectancy+effect%2C+(d)+the+Task+Force+had+misrepresented+the+role+of+inductive+and+deductive+logic%2C+and+(e)+the+validity+of+experimental+data+does+not+require+appealing+to+the+effect+size+or+statistical+power.&rft.date=2002&rft.type=Journal+(Paginated)&rft.type=PeerReviewed&rft.format=application%2Fpdf&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F2892%2F1%2FCritAPA.pdf&rft.identifier=++Chow%2C+Dr.+Siu+L.++(2002)+Issues+in+Statistical+Inference.++%5BJournal+(Paginated)%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F2892%2F