--- abstract: 'Computer-based argument mapping greatly enhances student critical thinking, more than tripling absolute gains made by other methods. I describe the method and my experience as an outsider. Argument mapping often showed precisely how students were erring (for example: confusing helping premises for separate reasons), making it much easier for them to fix their errors.' altloc: - http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~ctwardy/Papers/reasonpaper.pdf chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: ~ confdates: ~ conference: ~ confloc: ~ contact_email: ~ creators_id: - ctwardy creators_name: - family: Twardy given: Charles R. honourific: Dr. lineage: '' date: 2003 date_type: published datestamp: 2003-06-13 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/30/08 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: [] eprint_status: archive eprintid: 3008 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/3008/1/reasonpaper.pdf full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: ~ issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: 'Critical thinking, Teaching philosophy, Argument maps, Argument analysis' lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:55:17 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: show note: Revised for Teaching Philosophy. Posted with permission. number: ~ pagerange: ~ pubdom: FALSE publication: ~ publisher: ~ refereed: TRUE referencetext: |- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Second ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Donohue, A., van Gelder, T. J., Cumming, G., & Bissett, M. (2002). Reason! project studies, 1999-2002 (Tech. Rep. No. 2002/1). Department of Philosophy: University of Melbourne. Educational Statistics, N. C. for. (1997). The condition of education. Government Printing Office. (NCES 97-388, http://nces.ed.gov/pubs/ce) Facione, P. A. (1990, 1992). California critical thinking skills test. Available from California Academic Press. Garcia-Encinas, M. (2003 forthcoming). A posteriori necessity in singular causation and the Humean argument. Dialectica, 57. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64 74. (http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/ajpv3i.pdf visited 27 Feb. 2003) Hake, R. R. (1999, June). Analyzing change/gain scores. (An analysis of the data of Hake 1998 in terms of effect sizes . Available at http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/ AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf. Originally posted on 13 March 1999 to AERA-D American Educational Research Associations s Division D, Measurement and Research Methodology.) Hitchcock, D. L. (2003, February). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in criti-cal thinking. (Unpublished draft manuscript accepted for a conference in May 2003. Available from http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~hitchckd/effectiveness.pdf, cited with per-mission) Kohn, A. S. (1993). Punished by rewards. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: a user s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (forthcoming). How college affects students revisited: Research from the decade of the 1990s. Jossey-Bass. Powers, D. E., & Rock, D. A. (1998). Effects of coaching on SAT I: Reasoning scores (Report No. 98-6). The College Board. Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. New York: McGraw-Hill. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69 (1), 21 51. (http://www.aera.net/pubs/rer/abs/rer691-3.htm) van Gelder, T. J. (2001). How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers In Learning In Tertiary Education (ASCILITE 2001) (pp. 539 548). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne. (http://www.medfac.unimelb.edu.au/ascilite2001/ pdf/papers/vang%eldert.pdf) van Gelder, T. J. (2002). Argument mapping with Reason!Able. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers. van Gelder, T. J., & Cumming, G. (forthcoming). Change in critical thinking skills during college: A meta-analysis. relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 12 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:47:54 subjects: - appl-cog-psy succeeds: ~ suggestions: Please make the references box slightly larger. sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking type: preprint userid: 1189 volume: ~