]>
The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
Com_Green.pdf
preview.png
indexcodes.txt
text/html
HTML Summary of #3153
Some meta-theoretical issues relating to statistical inference
Some meta-theoretical issues relating to statistical inference (PDF)
Some meta-theoretical issues relating to statistical inference (Image (PNG))
Some meta-theoretical issues relating to statistical inference (Indexer Terms)
This paper is a reply to some comments made by Green (2002) on Chow’s (2002) critique of Wilkinson and Task Force's (1999) report on statistical inference. Issues raised are (a) the inappropriateness of accepting methodological prescription on authority, (ii) the vacuity of non-falsifiable theories, (iii) the need to distinguish between experiment and metaexperiment, and (iv) the probability foundation of the nullhypothesis significancetest procedure (NHSTP). This reply is intended to foster a better understanding of research methods in general, and of the role of NHSTP in empirical research in particular.
1
15
2003
Some meta-theoretical issues relating to statistical inference
Clinical Psychology
Philosophy of Science
Chow
Siu L
Siu L Chow
HIstory and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin