<ctx:context-object xsi:schemaLocation="info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:ctx http://www.openurl.info/registry/docs/info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:ctx" timestamp="2011-03-11T08:55:22Z" xmlns:ctx="info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:ctx" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XML"><ctx:referent><ctx:identifier>info:oai:cogprints.org:3232</ctx:identifier><ctx:metadata-by-val><ctx:format>info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:oai_dc</ctx:format><ctx:metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <dc:title>Onomatopoeia: Cuckoo-Language and Tick-Tocking+◊</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Tsur, Reuven</dc:creator>
        <dc:subject>Language</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Psycholinguistics</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Perceptual Cognitive Psychology</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Speech</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Phonology</dc:subject>
        <dc:description>This paper is a brief phonetic investigation of the nature of onomatopoeia. Onomatopoeia is the imitation of natural noises by speech sounds. To understand this phenomenon, we must realize that there is a problem here which is by no means trivial. There i s an infinite number of noises in nature, but only twenty-something letters in an alphabet that convey in any language a closed system of about fifty (up to a maximum of 100) speech sounds. I have devoted a book length study to the expressiveness of lang u age (What Makes Sound Patterns Expressive? -- The Poetic Mode of Speech Perception), but have only fleetingly touched upon onomatopoeia. In this paper I will recapitulate from that book the issue of acoustic coding, and then will toy around with two spe ci fic cases: why does the cuckoo say "kuku" in some languages, and why the clock prefers to say "tick-tock" rather than, say, tip-top. Only fleetingly I will touch upon the question why the speech sounds [s] and [S] (S represents the initial consonant of sh oe; s the initial consonant of sue) serve generally as onomatopoeia for noise. By way of doing all this, I will discuss a higher-order issue as well: How are effects translated from reality to some semiotic system, or from one semiotic system to ano ther.U.cns</dc:description>
        <dc:contributor>Magnus, Margaret</dc:contributor>
        <dc:date>2001</dc:date>
        <dc:type>Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)</dc:type>
        <dc:type>PeerReviewed</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:identifier>http://cogprints.org/3232/1/Cuckoo_onomatopoeia_2.html</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>  Tsur, Reuven  (2001) Onomatopoeia: Cuckoo-Language and Tick-Tocking+◊.  [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]     </dc:identifier>
        <dc:relation>http://cogprints.org/3232/</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc></ctx:metadata></ctx:metadata-by-val></ctx:referent></ctx:context-object>