creators_name: Wilson, Andrew
creators_name: Moudraia, Olga
type: other
datestamp: 2003-10-24
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:55:23
metadata_visibility: show
title: Interactive effects of shoe style and verbal cues on perceptions of female physicians' personal attributes
ispublished: unpub
subjects: soc-psy
full_text_status: public
keywords: Shoes; Clothing; Nonverbal Communication; Language; Social
Perception; Physicians, Women
abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether shoe style has any effect on perceptions of a female physician's personal characteristics when viewed alongside a transcript of a short outpatient consultation.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty postgraduate students of management or computer science. Twenty-five questionnaires were actually completed.
DESIGN: Respondents were randomly assigned to one of three groups, balanced for gender. Each group saw one stimulus combination: consultation transcript only; transcript combined with photograph of 'physician' wearing "conservative" black boots; transcript combined with
photograph of 'physician' wearing "trendy" multicoloured boots. All participants completed the same questionnaire.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceptions of the physician's approachability, professional image, ability to empathize with the patient, and amount of specialist experience, measured using five-point scales.
RESULTS: When viewed with the consultation transcript, perceptions of the physician wearing "trendy" multicoloured boots showed no significant difference from those of her wearing "conservative" black boots. There was a near-significant effect for approachability, with the physician in black boots being more approachable than the physician in multicoloured boots (p=0.0630). When viewed with the consultation transcript, perceptions of the physician wearing either "trendy" multicoloured boots or "conservative" black boots showed no significant difference from perceptions based on the the consultation transcript alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Shoe style does not appear to influence perceptions of female physicians when combined with verbal cues. However, the research requires replication with a larger sample. The incorporation of qualitative response and/or multimodal videotaped stimuli may improve study designs in this area.
date: 2003
date_type: published
refereed: FALSE
referencetext: 1. Damhorst ML. The impact of formality and similarity of attire on observers’ descriptions of interpersonal events [dissertation]. Austin (TX): The University of Texas at Austin; 1981.
2. Huddleston JE. Uniformed military counselors: effects of counselor attire on potential client initial perceptions and preferences [dissertation]. Denton (TX): University of North Texas; 1985.
3. Roberts AD. Selected clothing characteristics and educator credibility [dissertation]. Greensboro (NC): The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; 1990.
4. Barrett MSE. Do clothes make the therapist? [dissertation]. Memphis (TN): Memphis State University; 1993.
5. Workman JE. Effects of appropriate and inappropriate attire on attributions of personal dispositions [dissertation]. West Lafayette (IN): Purdue University; 1982.
6. Priddy DA. Counselor attire effects: replication and extension of past research [dissertation]. Iowa City (IA): The University of Iowa; 1985.
7. Lennon SJ. Effects of clothing attractiveness on perceptions. Home Economics Research Journal 1990 18(4): 303-310.
8. Lennon SJ, Miller FG. Salience of physical appearance in impression formation. Home Economics Research Journal 1984 13(2): 95-104.
9. Thurston JL, Lennon SJ, Clayton RV. Influence of age, body type, fashion, and garment type on women’s professional image. Home Economics Research Journal 1990 19(2): 139-150.
10. Sondermeyer CA. The interactive effects of clothing and powerful/powerless speech styles [dissertation]. Hattiesburg (MI): The University of Southern Mississippi; 1995.
11. Patton, SM. The effects of communicator affiliation, gender, and clothing on perceived communicator credibility [dissertation]. Kirksville (MO): Northeast Missouri State University;1987.
12. Colt HG, Solot JA. Attitudes of patients and physicians regarding physician dress and demeanor in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Feb;18(2):145-51.
13. Dunn JJ, Lee TH, Percelay JM, Fitz JG, Goldman L. Patient and house officer attitudes on physician attire and etiquette. JAMA. 1987 Jan 2;257(1):65-8.
14. Gjerdingen DK, Simpson DE. Physicians' attitudes about their professional appearance. Fam Pract Res J. 1989 Fall-Winter;9(1):57-64.
15. Gonzalez Del Rey JA, Paul RI. Preferences of parents for pediatric emergency physicians' attire. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1995 Dec;11(6):361-4.
16. Hennessy N, Harrison DA, Aitkenhead AR. The effect of the anaesthetist's attire on patient attitudes. The influence of dress on patient perception of the anaesthetist's prestige. Anaesthesia. 1993 Mar;48(3):219-22.
17. Matsui D, Cho M, Rieder MJ. Physicians' attire as perceived by young children and their parents: the myth of the white coat syndrome. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1998 Jun;14(3):198-201.
18. Nair BR, Attia JR, Mears SR, Hitchcock KI. Evidence-based physicians' dressing: a crossover trial. Med J Aust. 2002 Dec 2-16;177(11-12):681-2.
19. Menahem S, Shvartzman P. Is our appearance important to our patients? Fam Pract. 1998 Oct;15(5):391-7.
20. Leech G. 100 million words of English. English Today 1993 33(9:1): 9-15.
21. Waddington TJ. MRI update: the effect of dentist attire on patient perceptions of skill, caring and professionalism. Br Dent J. 1996 Feb 10;180(3):86-7.
22. Wilson A, Moudraia O. Quantitative or qualitative content analysis? Experiences from a cross-cultural comparison of female students' attitudes to shoe fashions in Germany, Poland and Russia. In: Wilson A, Rayson P, Archer D, editors. Corpus linguistics around the world. Amsterdam: Rodopi; forthcoming 2003.

citation:   Wilson, Dr Andrew and Moudraia, Dr Olga  (2003) Interactive effects of shoe style and verbal cues on perceptions of female physicians' personal attributes.     (Unpublished)  
document_url: http://cogprints.org/3248/1/shoeverb.pdf