?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=Meaning+postulates+and+deference&rft.creator=Horsey%2C+Richard&rft.subject=Cognitive+Psychology&rft.subject=Philosophy+of+Mind&rft.subject=Pragmatics&rft.description=Fodor+(1998)+argues+that+most+lexical+concepts+have+no+internal+structure.+He+rejects+what+he+calls+Inferential+Role+Semantics+(IRS)%2C+the+view+that+primitive+concepts+are+constituted+by+their+inferential+relations%2C+on+the+grounds+that+this+violates+the+compositionality+constraint+and+leads+to+an+unacceptable+form+of+holism.+In+rejecting+IRS%2C+Fodor+must+also+reject+meaning+postulates.+I+argue%2C+contra+Fodor%2C+that+meaning+postulates+must+be+retained%2C+but+that+when+suitably+constrained+they+are+not+susceptible+to+his+arguments+against+IRS.+This+has+important+implications+for+the+view+that+certain+of+our+concepts+are+deferential.+A+consequence+of+the+arguments+I+present+is+that+deference+is+relegated+to+a+relatively+minor+role+in+what+Sperber+(1997)+refers+to+as+reflective+concepts%3B+deference+has+no+important+role+to+play+in+the+vast+majority+of+our+intuitive+concepts.&rft.date=2000&rft.type=Journal+(Paginated)&rft.type=NonPeerReviewed&rft.format=application%2Fpdf&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F3257%2F1%2Fdeference.pdf&rft.identifier=++Horsey%2C+Richard++(2000)+Meaning+postulates+and+deference.++%5BJournal+(Paginated)%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F3257%2F