---
abstract: |-
This paper presents a summary of multifaceted
evaluation factors that we have
identified through our research with
Broadband Visual Communication (BVC)
projects involving multiple stakeholders. The
main benefit of these evaluation factors is
that they provide a general evaluation
framework for multiple stakeholder projects.
The factors are social infrastructure,
technical infrastructure, physical space,
interaction style and content.
altloc: []
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: 10-12 June 2002
conference: "Eleventh IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastrcutures for Collaborative Entreprises (WETICE '02)"
confloc: 'Pittsburgh, PA, USA'
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Barfurth
given: Marion A.
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Singer
given: Janice
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Emond
given: Bruno
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Vinson
given: Norman
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Brooks
given: Martin
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Spence
given: John
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 2002
date_type: published
datestamp: 2004-07-06
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/33/96
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 3396
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/3396/1/Barfurth02_nrc.pdf
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'Video Mediated Communication, Collaborative Technologies, Field Study Evaluation, Multistakeholder projects'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:55:27
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: 18-22
pubdom: FALSE
publication: ~
publisher: IEEE Computer Society
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: |-
[1] J.S. Angiolillo, H.E. Blanchard, E.W. Israelski, A. Mane, “Technology Constraints of Video-Mediated Communication,” in K.E. Finn, A.J. Sellen and S.B. Wilbur (Eds) Video-mediated Communication, Lawrence
Erlbaum: NJ:Mahwah, 1997.
[2] M.A. Barfurth, “Understanding the collaborative learning process in a technology rich environment: The case of children's disagreements,” in J.L. Schnase and E.L. Cunnius (Eds), Proceedings of the first international conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning
(CSCL95), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995, 8-13.
[3] K.E. Finn, “Introduction: An Overview of Video-Mediated Communication,”, in K.E. Finn, A.J. Sellen and S.B. Wilbur (Eds) Video-mediated Communication, Lawrence
Erlbaum: NJ:Mahwah, 1997.
[4] R. Fish, et al., “Video as a Technology for Informal Communication,” Communications of the ACM, 36 (1), 1993
[5] J. Hollan, E. Hutchins, D. Kirsch, “Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer interaction Research.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol 7, No 2, 2000.
[6] W. Huang, J. Olson, G. Olson, “Camera Angle Affects Dominance in Video-Mediated Communication,” CHI ’02, 2002.
[7]M. Jackson, A. Anderson, R. McEwan, J. Mullin, “Impact of Video Frame Rate on Communicative Behaviour in Two and Four Party Groups,” CSCW ’00, 2000.
[8] R. Kraut, et al., “Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration: Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work,” To appear in P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
[9]C.J. Metcalf, D.J. Morton, “Having Fun on the Access Grid: Building Informal Relationships through the Beer
Symposium,” AG Retreat, 2002
[10]A. Monk, L. Watts, “A Poor Quality Video Link Affects Speech, But Not Gaze,” CHI 95, 1995.
[11] G.M. Olson, J.S. Olson, “Making Sense of the Findings: Common Vocabulary Leads to the Synthesis Necessary for Theory Building,” in K.E. Finn, A.J. Sellen and S.B.
Wilbur (Eds) Video-mediated Communication, Lawrence Erlbaum: NJ:Mahwah, 1997.
[12] D. Pinelle, C. Gutwin, “A Review of Groupware Evaluations,” WETICE Workshop on evaluating Collaborative
Enterprises, 2000.
[13] R. Procter, et al. “An investigation of the Influence of Network Quality of Service on the Effectiveness of Multimedia Communication,” Group 99, 1999.
[14] A. Sellen, “Assessing Video-Mediated Conduct: A discussion of different analytic approaches,” in K.E. Finn, A.J. Sellen and S.B. Wilbur (Eds) Video-mediated
Communication, Lawrence Erlbaum: NJ:Mahwah, 1997.
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 12
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:50:43
subjects:
- comp-sci-hci
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: Evaluation Factors for Multi-Stakeholder Broadband Visual Communication Projects
type: confpaper
userid: 3938
volume: ~