---
abstract: This review tries to give overview of key issues of Bennett and Hacker's neurophilosophy and theoretical physiology attempt and to estimate possibilities of that neurophilosophy to be accepted by real neuro and life sciences.
altloc:
- http://biomedicum.ut.ee/~andress/inglise/papers/on%20bennett%20hacker.htm
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: 'Max R. Bennett and Peter M. S. Hacker, Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell Publishing (2003)'
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Soosaar
given: Andres
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 2004
date_type: published
datestamp: 2004-07-30
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/37/28
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 3728
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/3728/1/bennett_hacker_on_neuroscience.htm
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: unpub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'neurophilosophy, the mind-body problem, the organism-organ problem, cognitive functions'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:55:38
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: ~
pubdom: FALSE
publication: ~
publisher: ~
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: ~
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:53:06
subjects:
- phil-sci
succeeds: ~
suggestions: 'This review was sent to Philosophy of Science journal but rejected by external reviewer as too long and not in good agreement with some philosophical doctrines. '
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: "Review of Bennett and Hacker, Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience\n\n"
type: other
userid: 1596
volume: ~