--- abstract: 'Traditional accounts of gender as a grammatical category fail to grasp the essence of its meaning. A cognitive approach to the analysis of Russian nominal gender classification provides deeper insights into the relationship between grammar and man’s cognitive activity, making explanation of grammatical facts more comprehensible.' altloc: - http://seelrc.org/glossos/issues/3/kravchenko.pdf chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: ~ confdates: October 2001 conference: 2nd annual conference on Slavic cognitive linguistics confloc: 'Charlottesville, VA' contact_email: ~ creators_id: [] creators_name: - family: Kravchenko given: A.V. honourific: Prof. lineage: '' date: 2002 date_type: published datestamp: 2004-12-28 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/40/07 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: - family: Janda given: L. honourific: Dr. lineage: '' eprint_status: archive eprintid: 4007 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/4007/1/RootsOfGender.pdf full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: pub issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: ~ lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:55:48 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: show note: ~ number: 3 pagerange: ~ pubdom: FALSE publication: ~ publisher: The Slavic and East European Language Resource Center refereed: TRUE referencetext: |- Кравченко А. В. (1992) Вопросы теории указательности: Эгоцентричность. Дейктичность. Индексальность [Issues in the theory of indication: Egocentricity. Deixis. Indexicality]. Издательство Иркутского университета. Кравченко А. В. (1996) Язык и восприятие: Когнитивные аспекты языковой категоризации [Language and perception: Cognitive aspects of linguistic categorization. Irkutsk University Press]. Издательство Иркутского университета. Шведова Н. Ю., Лопатин В. В. (ред.) (1989) Краткая русская грамматика [Abridged Russian grammar]. Москва: Русский язык. Русская грамматика [Russian grammar] (1980) Москва: Наука. Черных П. Я. (1994) Историко-этимологический словарь современного русского языка. Т. 1-2. [Historical etymological dictionary of Modern Russian language. Vol. 1-2]. Москва:Русский язык. Albertazzi, L. (Ed.) (2000). Meaning and cognition. John Benjamins. Allwood, J., Gaerdenfors, P. (Eds.) (1999). Cognitive semantics: Meaning and cognition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Bickerton. D. (1990). Language & species. The University of Chicago Press. Brugmann, K. (1889). Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen / B. 2, H. 1: Wortbildungslehre. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner. Devitt, M., Sterelny, K. (1999). Language and reality. An introduction to the philosophy of language (2nd edition). The MIT Press. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Fuchs, C., Robert, S. (Eds.) (1999). Language diversity and cognitive representations. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Gelman, S. A., Bloom, P. (2000). Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it. Cognition, 76, 91-103. Kim, J. (1998). Mind in a physical world: An essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. The University of Chicago Press. Lepore, E., Pylyshyn, Z. (Eds.) (1999). What is cognitive science? Blackwell. Levi-Strauss, C. (1962) La pensee sauvage. Paris. Margolis, E. (1994). A reassessment of the shift from the classical theory of concepts to prototype theory. Cognition, 51, 73-89. A. Kravchenko, The cognitive roots of gender in Russian 13 Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (Eds.) (1999). Concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Matan, A., Carey, S. (2001). Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts. Cognition, 78, 1-26. Nelson, D. G. K., Frankenfield, A., Morris, C. & Blair, E. (2000). Young children’s use of functional information to categorize artifacts: three factors that matter. Cognition, 77, 133-168. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. Palmeri, T. J., Blalock, C. (2000). The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization. Cognition, 77, B45-B57. Premack, D. (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects // Cognition. Vol. 36, # 1. Priest, S. (1991). Theories of the mind. The Penguin Books. Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). What’s in your mind? In E. Lepore & Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science? Blackwell. Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350. Rosch, E. H. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 1. - N.Y.: Academic Press. Schlechtman, M. (1997). The brain/body problem. Philosophical Psychology, 10 - 2, 149-164. Schyns, P. G. (1997). Categories and percepts: a bi-directional framework for categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 183-189. Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Wallis, G., Bülthoff, H. (1999). Learning to recognize objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 22-31. relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 12 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:54:59 subjects: - ling-morph - ling-prag succeeds: ~ suggestions: ~ sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: The cognitive roots of gender in Russian type: confpaper userid: 5318 volume: ~