<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sword="http://purl.org/net/sword/">
  <link rel="self" href="http://cogprints.org/cgi/export/eprint/4151/Atom/cogprints-eprint-4151.xml"/>
  <link rel="edit" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4151"/>
  <link rel="edit-media" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4151/contents"/>
  <link rel="contents" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4151/contents"/>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4151"/>
  <published>2005-03-29Z</published>
  <updated>2011-03-11T08:55:52Z</updated>
  <id>http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4151</id>
  <category term="bookchapter" label="Book Chapter" scheme="http://cogprints.org/data/eprint/type"/>
  <category term="archive" label="Live Archive" scheme="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0/eprint/eprint_status"/>
  <link rel="http://purl.org/net/sword/terms/statement" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4151"/>
  <sword:state href="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0/eprint/eprint_status/archive"/>
  <sword:stateDescription>This item is in the repository with the URL: http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4151</sword:stateDescription>
  <sword:originalDeposit href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4151">
    <sword:depositedOn>2005-03-29Z</sword:depositedOn>
  </sword:originalDeposit>
  <title type="xhtml">Spare Me the Complements: An Immoderate Proposal for Eliminating the "We/They" Category Boundary</title>
  <summary type="xhtml">A speculative hypothesis about how to eliminate the "we/they" distinction by rearing children (during early critical years) in "aggregates in flux" instead of in kinship-based families: A category cannot be formed from positive examples only: one must be able to sample both what is and what is not in a category in order to recognise the category at all. The basis for the distinction is the features shared by the members (invariants), and absent from the non-members. In "aggregates in flux," the individual members would be constantly varying (and unrelated, genetically). The only invariant would be that they are all human.</summary>
  <author>
    <name>Stevan Harnad</name>
    <email>63</email>
  </author>
</entry>