<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sword="http://purl.org/net/sword/">
  <link rel="self" href="http://cogprints.org/cgi/export/eprint/429/Atom/cogprints-eprint-429.xml"/>
  <link rel="edit" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429"/>
  <link rel="edit-media" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429/contents"/>
  <link rel="contents" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429/contents"/>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429"/>
  <published>1998-03-22Z</published>
  <updated>2011-03-11T08:53:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429</id>
  <category term="preprint" label="Preprint" scheme="http://cogprints.org/data/eprint/type"/>
  <category term="archive" label="Live Archive" scheme="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0/eprint/eprint_status"/>
  <link rel="http://purl.org/net/sword/terms/statement" href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429"/>
  <sword:state href="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0/eprint/eprint_status/archive"/>
  <sword:stateDescription>This item is in the repository with the URL: http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429</sword:stateDescription>
  <sword:originalDeposit href="http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429">
    <sword:depositedOn>1998-03-22Z</sword:depositedOn>
  </sword:originalDeposit>
  <title type="xhtml">Consciousness in Human and Robot Minds</title>
  <summary type="xhtml">The best reason for believing that robots might some day  become conscious is that we human beings are conscious, and we are a sort of robot ourselves. That is, we are extraordinarily  complex self-controlling, self-sustaining physical mechanisms, designed over the eons by natural selection, and operating  according to the same well-understood principles that govern  all the other physical processes in living things: digestive and metabolic processes, self-repair and reproductive processes, for instance. It may be wildly over-ambitious to suppose that human artificers can repeat Nature's triumph, with variations  in material, form, and design process, but this is not a deep objection. It is not as if a conscious machine contradicted any fundamental laws of nature, the way a perpetual motion  machine does. Still, many skeptics believe--or in any event want to believe--that it will never be done. I wouldn't wager against them, but my reasons for skepticism are mundane,  economic reasons, not theoretical reasons.</summary>
  <author>
    <name>Daniel C. Dennett</name>
    <email/>
  </author>
</entry>