<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Consciousness in Human and Robot Minds</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Daniel C.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Dennett</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The best reason for believing that robots might some day  become conscious is that we human beings are conscious, and we are a sort of robot ourselves. That is, we are extraordinarily  complex self-controlling, self-sustaining physical mechanisms, designed over the eons by natural selection, and operating  according to the same well-understood principles that govern  all the other physical processes in living things: digestive and metabolic processes, self-repair and reproductive processes, for instance. It may be wildly over-ambitious to suppose that human artificers can repeat Nature's triumph, with variations  in material, form, and design process, but this is not a deep objection. It is not as if a conscious machine contradicted any fundamental laws of nature, the way a perpetual motion  machine does. Still, many skeptics believe--or in any event want to believe--that it will never be done. I wouldn't wager against them, but my reasons for skepticism are mundane,  economic reasons, not theoretical reasons.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Applied Cognitive Psychology</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Robotics</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">1994</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Preprint</mods:genre></mods:mods>