<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<eprints xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <eprint id='http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/429'>
    <eprintid>429</eprintid>
    <rev_number>8</rev_number>
    <documents>
      <document id='http://cogprints.org/id/document/10569'>
        <docid>10569</docid>
        <rev_number>1</rev_number>
        <files>
          <file id='http://cogprints.org/id/file/42896'>
            <fileid>42896</fileid>
            <datasetid>document</datasetid>
            <objectid>10569</objectid>
            <filename>concrobt.htm</filename>
            <mime_type>text/html</mime_type>
            <filesize>45191</filesize>
            <mtime>2009-12-08 20:30:52</mtime>
            <url>http://cogprints.org/429/1/concrobt.htm</url>
          </file>
        </files>
        <eprintid>429</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <placement>1</placement>
        <mime_type>text/html</mime_type>
        <format>text/html</format>
        <security>public</security>
        <main>concrobt.htm</main>
      </document>
    </documents>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>38</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/00/04/29</dir>
    <datestamp>1998-03-22</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2011-03-11 08:53:54</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2007-09-12 16:27:47</status_changed>
    <type>preprint</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <item_issues_count>0</item_issues_count>
    <abstract>The best reason for believing that robots might some day  become conscious is that we human beings are conscious, and we are a sort of robot ourselves. That is, we are extraordinarily  complex self-controlling, self-sustaining physical mechanisms, designed over the eons by natural selection, and operating  according to the same well-understood principles that govern  all the other physical processes in living things: digestive and metabolic processes, self-repair and reproductive processes, for instance. It may be wildly over-ambitious to suppose that human artificers can repeat Nature&apos;s triumph, with variations  in material, form, and design process, but this is not a deep objection. It is not as if a conscious machine contradicted any fundamental laws of nature, the way a perpetual motion  machine does. Still, many skeptics believe--or in any event want to believe--that it will never be done. I wouldn&apos;t wager against them, but my reasons for skepticism are mundane,  economic reasons, not theoretical reasons.</abstract>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Dennett</family>
          <given>Daniel C.</given>
        </name>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <pubdom>FALSE</pubdom>
    <refereed>FALSE</refereed>
    <subjects>
      <item>appl-cog-psy</item>
      <item>comp-sci-robot</item>
    </subjects>
    <title>Consciousness in Human and Robot Minds</title>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <date>1994</date>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
  </eprint>
</eprints>
