@misc{cogprints4303, volume = {2}, number = {4}, month = {October}, author = {B{\'e}atrice Brembilla-Perrot}, editor = {Balbir Singh and Yash Lokhandwala and Johnson Francis and Anup Gupta}, title = {Electrophysiological evaluation of Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome}, publisher = {Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Group}, year = {2002}, journal = {Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal}, pages = {143--152}, keywords = {Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, sudden death, Electrophysiologic study }, url = {http://cogprints.org/4303/}, abstract = {Sudden death might complicate the follow-up of symptomatic patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW) and might be the first event in patients with asymptomatic WPW. The risk of sudden death is increased in some clinical situations. Generally, the noninvasive studies are unable to predict the risk of sudden death correctly . The electrophysiological study is the best means to detect the risk of sudden death and to evaluate the nature of symptoms. Methods used to define the prognosis of WPW are well-defined. At first the maximal rate of conduction through the accessory pathway is evaluated; programmed atrial stimulation using 1 and 2 extrastimuli delivered at different cycle lengths is then used to determine the accessory pathway refractory period and to induce a supraventricular tachycardia. These methods should be performed in the control state and repeated in adrenergic situations either during exercise test or more simply during a perfusion of small doses of isoproterenol. The induction of an atrial fibrillation with rapid conduction through the accessory pathway ({\ensuremath{>}} 240/min in control state, {\ensuremath{>}} 300/min after isoproterenol) is the sign of a form of WPW at risk of sudden death. } }