<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<eprints xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <eprint id='http://cogprints.org/id/eprint/4647'>
    <eprintid>4647</eprintid>
    <rev_number>8</rev_number>
    <documents>
      <document id='http://cogprints.org/id/document/2943'>
        <docid>2943</docid>
        <rev_number>1</rev_number>
        <files>
          <file id='http://cogprints.org/id/file/14909'>
            <fileid>14909</fileid>
            <datasetid>document</datasetid>
            <objectid>2943</objectid>
            <filename>ct.htm</filename>
            <mime_type>text/html</mime_type>
            <filesize>96860</filesize>
            <mtime>2009-12-08 20:54:00</mtime>
            <url>http://cogprints.org/4647/1/ct.htm</url>
          </file>
        </files>
        <eprintid>4647</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <mime_type>text/html</mime_type>
        <format>text/html</format>
        <language>en</language>
        <security>public</security>
        <main>ct.htm</main>
      </document>
    </documents>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>352</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/00/46/47</dir>
    <datestamp>2005-12-19</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2011-03-11 08:56:14</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2007-09-12 17:01:23</status_changed>
    <type>journalp</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <item_issues_count>0</item_issues_count>
    <abstract>Selection theory requires multiple, distinct, simultaneously-actualized states. In cognition, each thought or cognitive state changes the &apos;selection pressure&apos; against which the next is evaluated; they are not simultaneously selected amongst. Creative thought is more a matter of honing in a vague idea through redescribing successive iterations of it from different real or imagined perspectives; in other words, actualizing potential through exposure to different contexts. It has been proven that the mathematical description of contextual change of state introduces a non-Kolmogorovian probability distribution, and a classical formalism such as selection theory cannot be used. This paper argues that creative thought evolves not through a Darwinian process, but a process of context-driven actualization of potential.</abstract>
    <altloc>
      <item>http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/liane/papers/ct.htm</item>
    </altloc>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Gabora</family>
          <given>Liane M.</given>
          <honourific>Dr.</honourific>
        </name>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <editors>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Ward</family>
          <given>Thomas B.</given>
          <honourific>Dr.</honourific>
        </name>
      </item>
    </editors>
    <ispublished>inpress</ispublished>
    <keywords>creativity, evolution, selection, universal Darwinism, determinism, potentiality, context, stream of thought</keywords>
    <number>4</number>
    <pagerange>65-87</pagerange>
    <pubdom>TRUE</pubdom>
    <publication>Journal of Creative Behavior</publication>
    <publisher>Creative Education Foundation Inc.</publisher>
    <refereed>TRUE</refereed>
    <referencetext>Accardi, L., Fedullo, A. (1982). On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum mechanics, Il Nuovo Cimento , 34(7), 161-172.

Aerts, D. (1982). Description of many physical entities Without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 12, 1131-1170. [pdf] 

Aerts, D. (1986). A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics , 27, 202-210. [pdf]

Aerts, D., &amp; Aerts, S. (1994). Application of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes, Foundations of Science, 1, 85-97. [pdf]

Aerts, D., Aerts, S., Broekaert, J., &amp; Gabora, L. (2000). The violation of Bell inequalities in the macroworld. Foundations of Physics, 30(9), 1387-1414. [quant-ph/0007044]] [pdf] 

Aerts, D., Broekaert, J. and Gabora, L. (in press). A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition. In R. Campbell (Ed.), No Matter, Never Mind, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Aerts, D., D&apos;Hondt, E., &amp; Gabora, L. (2000). Why the disjunction in quantum logic is not classical. . Foundations of Physics, 30(9), 1473-1480. [quant-ph/0007041] [pdf]

Aerts, D., Durt, T., Grib, A. &amp; Van Bogaert, B., &amp; Zapatrin, A. (1992). Quantum structures in macroscopical reality. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 32, 489-498. [pdf]

Aerts, D. &amp; Van Bogaert, B. (1993). A mechanistic classical laboratory situation with a quantum logic structure. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 31, 1839-1848. [pdf] 

Amabiles, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder CO: Westview.

Boden, M. (1990). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms . London: Weidenfeld &amp; Nicolson.

Boyd, R. &amp; Richerson,  P. (2001). Built for speed, not for comfort: Darwinian theory and human culture. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 23, 423-463.

Burnet, F. M. (1959). The clonal selection theory of acquired immunity. London: Cambridge University Press. 

Calvin, W. H. (1996a). How brains think . New York: Basic Books.

Calvin, W. H. (1996b). The cerebral code. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Calvin, W. H. &amp; Bickerton, D. (2000). Lingua ex machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the human brain. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Campbell D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.

Campbell D. T. (1965). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In H. R. Barringer, G. I. Blanksten, &amp; R. W. Mack (Eds.), Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA Schenkman. 

Campbell, D. T. (1987). Evolutionary epistomology. In G. Radnitzky &amp; W. W. Bartley III (Eds.), Evolutionary Epistomology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge . LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

Campbell, D.T. (1990). Levels of organization, downward causation, and the selection-theory approach to evolutionary epistemology. In Greenberg &amp; Tobach (Eds.), Theories of the Evolution of Knowing. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Churchland, P. S. and Sejnowski, T. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity . New York: Harper.

Cziko, G. (1997). Without miracles: Universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Cziko, G. (1998). From blind to creative: In defense of Donald Campbell&apos;s selectionist theory of human creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 192-212.

Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin&apos;s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Edelman, G. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection . New York: Basic Books.

Edelman, G. (2000). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind . New York: Basic Books.

Felman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 169-186). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Felman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., &amp; Gardner, M. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity . Westport CT: Praeger.

Findlay, C. S., &amp; Lumsden, C. J (1988). The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 11, 3-55.

Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon: Oxford University Press.

Gabora, L. (2000). Toward a theory of creative inklings. In R. Ascott (Ed.), Art, Technology, and Consciousness. Bristol, UK: Intellect Press. [pdf]

Gabora (2001). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the origin and evolution of culture . Doctoral thesis, Free University of Brussels. [pdf]

Gabora, L. (2002a). The beer can theory of creativity. In P. Bentley &amp; D. Corne (Eds.), Creative Evolutionary Systems (pp. 147-161). San Francisco CA: Morgan Kauffman. [pdf]

Gabora, L. (2002b). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In T. Hewett &amp; T. Kavanagh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 126-133). October 13-16, Loughborough University, UK. 

Gabora, L. (2003). Contextual focus: A cognitive explanation for the cultural transition of the Middle/Upper Paleolithic. In R. Alterman &amp; D. Kirsh (Eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston MA, July 31-August 2. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

Gabora, L. (2004). Ideas are not replicators but minds are. Biology and Philosophy, 19(1), 127-143. [pdf]

Gabora, L. (in prep). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the evolution of a creative idea.

Gabora, L. &amp; Aerts, D. (2002). Contextualizing concepts using a mathematical generalization of the quantum formalism, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 14(4), 327-358. [quant-ph/0205161] [ pdf]

Gabora, L. (in press) Self-other organization: Why early life did not evolve through natural selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology, accepted. 

Gabora, L. &amp; Aerts, D. (2005). Evolution as context-driven actualization of potential: Toward an interdisciplinary theory of change of state. Interdisc. Sci. Rev. 30(1), 69-88. [nlin.AO/0510077] [pdf] 

Gould, S. J. (1991). Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History (pp. 63-66). New York: W. W. Norton &amp; Company.

Gruber, H. E. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In D. B. Wallace &amp; H. E. Gruber (Eds.) Creative People at Work (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.


Haldane, J. B. S. (1932). The causes of evolution. New York: Longman.

Hallpike, C. R. (1986). The principles of social evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hinton, G. E. &amp; J. A. Anderson. (1981). Parallel models of associative memory . Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Howard-Jones, P. A. &amp; Murray, S. (2003). Ideational productivity, focus of attention, and context. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2&amp;3), 153-166.

Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., &amp; Glenn, S. S. (2001). A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 511-573.

Jeffreys, M. (2000). The meme metaphor. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine , 43(2), 227-242.

Jerne, N. (1967). Antibodies and learning: selection versus instruction. In G. Quarton, T. Melnechuk, &amp; F. Schmitt (Eds.), The Neurosciences: A Study Program (pp. 200-205). New York: Rockefeller University Press.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Kauffman, S. A. (1993). Origins of order . New York: Oxford University Press.

Lorenz, K. (1971). Studies in animal and human behavior. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Lumsden, C. J. (1999). Evolving creative minds: Stories and mechanisms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp.153-168). New York: Cambridge University Press.

McCoy, J. M. &amp; Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(384), 409-426. 

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. 

Newman S. A. &amp; MŸller, G. B. (1999). Morphological evolution: Epigenetic mechanisms. In Embryonic Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. London: Nature Publishing Group.

Okasha, S. (2001). Which processes are selection processes?, Commentary on Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., &amp; Glenn, S. S., A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 548-549.

Palm, G. (1980). On associative memory. Biological Cybernetics, 36, 19-31.

Pepper, J. W. &amp; Knudsen, T. (2001). Selection without multiple replicators? Commentary on Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., &amp; Glenn, S. S., A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 550.

Perkins, D. N. (1998). In the country of the blind: An appreciation of Donald Campbell&apos;s vision of creative thought. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 177-191.

Perkins, D. N. ( 2000). Archimede&apos; bathtub: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking . New York: W. W. Norton and Company. 

Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works . New York: Harper.

Rosch, E. (1999). Reclaiming concepts. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11), 61-78. 

Pitowsky, I. (1989). Quantum Probability—Quantum Logic: Lecture Notes in Physics 321 , Berlin: Springer.

Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Routledge.

Randall, C. &amp; Foulis, D. (1976). A mathematical setting for inductive reasoning. In C. Hooker (Ed.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science (vol. III, pp. 169). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Rumelhart, D. E. &amp; McClelland, J. L. Eds. (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge MA: Bradford/MIT Press.

Schwartz, J. H. (1999). Sudden origins. New York: Wiley.

Simonton, D. K. (19984). Genius, creativity and leadership: Historiometric inquiries . Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.&lt;

Simonton, D. K. (1998). Donald Campbell&apos;s model of the creative process: Creativity as blind variation and selective retention. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 153-158. 

Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity . New York: Oxford.

Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309-328.

Simonton, D. K. (in press). Exceptional creativity and chance: Creative thought as a stochastic combinatorial process. In L. V. Shavinina &amp; M. Ferrari (Eds.), Beyond Knowledge: Extracognitive Facets in Developing High Ability . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1-43. 

Sober, E. &amp; Wilson, D. S. (1994). A critical review of philosophical work on the units of selection problem. Philosophy of Science, 49, 157-180.

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 159-176.

Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C. &amp; Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters.  Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2), 75-101.

Sternberg, R. J. &amp; Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity . New York: Free Press.

Thagard, P. (1980). Against evolutionary epistomology. In P. D. Asquith &amp; R. N. Giere (Eds.) PSA 1980, p. 187-96. 

Wright, S. (1931).  Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97-159.

Ziman, J., Ed. (2000). Technical innovation as an evolutionary process . New York: Cambridge University Press.
</referencetext>
    <subjects>
      <item>bio-evo</item>
      <item>cog-psy</item>
      <item>phil-mind</item>
      <item>evol-psy</item>
      <item>bio-theory</item>
    </subjects>
    <title>Creative thought as a non-Darwinian evolutionary process</title>
    <volume>39</volume>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <date>2005</date>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
  </eprint>
</eprints>
