--- abstract: "Selection theory requires multiple, distinct, simultaneously-actualized states. In cognition, each thought or cognitive state changes the 'selection pressure' against which the next is evaluated; they are not simultaneously selected amongst. Creative thought is more a matter of honing in a vague idea through redescribing successive iterations of it from different real or imagined perspectives; in other words, actualizing potential through exposure to different contexts. It has been proven that the mathematical description of contextual change of state introduces a non-Kolmogorovian probability distribution, and a classical formalism such as selection theory cannot be used. This paper argues that creative thought evolves not through a Darwinian process, but a process of context-driven actualization of potential." altloc: - http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/liane/papers/ct.htm chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: ~ confdates: ~ conference: ~ confloc: ~ contact_email: ~ creators_id: [] creators_name: - family: Gabora given: Liane M. honourific: Dr. lineage: '' date: 2005 date_type: published datestamp: 2005-12-19 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/46/47 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: - family: Ward given: Thomas B. honourific: Dr. lineage: '' eprint_status: archive eprintid: 4647 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/4647/1/ct.htm full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: inpress issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: 'creativity, evolution, selection, universal Darwinism, determinism, potentiality, context, stream of thought' lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:56:14 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: show note: ~ number: 4 pagerange: 65-87 pubdom: TRUE publication: Journal of Creative Behavior publisher: Creative Education Foundation Inc. refereed: TRUE referencetext: | Accardi, L., Fedullo, A. (1982). On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum mechanics, Il Nuovo Cimento , 34(7), 161-172. Aerts, D. (1982). Description of many physical entities Without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 12, 1131-1170. [pdf] Aerts, D. (1986). A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics , 27, 202-210. [pdf] Aerts, D., & Aerts, S. (1994). Application of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes, Foundations of Science, 1, 85-97. [pdf] Aerts, D., Aerts, S., Broekaert, J., & Gabora, L. (2000). The violation of Bell inequalities in the macroworld. Foundations of Physics, 30(9), 1387-1414. [quant-ph/0007044]] [pdf] Aerts, D., Broekaert, J. and Gabora, L. (in press). A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition. In R. Campbell (Ed.), No Matter, Never Mind, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Aerts, D., D'Hondt, E., & Gabora, L. (2000). Why the disjunction in quantum logic is not classical. . Foundations of Physics, 30(9), 1473-1480. [quant-ph/0007041] [pdf] Aerts, D., Durt, T., Grib, A. & Van Bogaert, B., & Zapatrin, A. (1992). Quantum structures in macroscopical reality. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 32, 489-498. [pdf] Aerts, D. & Van Bogaert, B. (1993). A mechanistic classical laboratory situation with a quantum logic structure. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 31, 1839-1848. [pdf] Amabiles, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder CO: Westview. Boden, M. (1990). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms . London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. (2001). Built for speed, not for comfort: Darwinian theory and human culture. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 23, 423-463. Burnet, F. M. (1959). The clonal selection theory of acquired immunity. London: Cambridge University Press. Calvin, W. H. (1996a). How brains think . New York: Basic Books. Calvin, W. H. (1996b). The cerebral code. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Calvin, W. H. & Bickerton, D. (2000). Lingua ex machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the human brain. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Campbell D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400. Campbell D. T. (1965). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In H. R. Barringer, G. I. Blanksten, & R. W. Mack (Eds.), Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA Schenkman. Campbell, D. T. (1987). Evolutionary epistomology. In G. Radnitzky & W. W. Bartley III (Eds.), Evolutionary Epistomology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge . LaSalle, IL: Open Court. Campbell, D.T. (1990). Levels of organization, downward causation, and the selection-theory approach to evolutionary epistemology. In Greenberg & Tobach (Eds.), Theories of the Evolution of Knowing. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. Churchland, P. S. and Sejnowski, T. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity . New York: Harper. Cziko, G. (1997). Without miracles: Universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Cziko, G. (1998). From blind to creative: In defense of Donald Campbell's selectionist theory of human creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 192-212. Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster. Edelman, G. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection . New York: Basic Books. Edelman, G. (2000). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind . New York: Basic Books. Felman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 169-186). New York: Cambridge University Press. Felman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, M. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity . Westport CT: Praeger. Findlay, C. S., & Lumsden, C. J (1988). The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 11, 3-55. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon: Oxford University Press. Gabora, L. (2000). Toward a theory of creative inklings. In R. Ascott (Ed.), Art, Technology, and Consciousness. Bristol, UK: Intellect Press. [pdf] Gabora (2001). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the origin and evolution of culture . Doctoral thesis, Free University of Brussels. [pdf] Gabora, L. (2002a). The beer can theory of creativity. In P. Bentley & D. Corne (Eds.), Creative Evolutionary Systems (pp. 147-161). San Francisco CA: Morgan Kauffman. [pdf] Gabora, L. (2002b). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In T. Hewett & T. Kavanagh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 126-133). October 13-16, Loughborough University, UK. Gabora, L. (2003). Contextual focus: A cognitive explanation for the cultural transition of the Middle/Upper Paleolithic. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston MA, July 31-August 2. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gabora, L. (2004). Ideas are not replicators but minds are. Biology and Philosophy, 19(1), 127-143. [pdf] Gabora, L. (in prep). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the evolution of a creative idea. Gabora, L. & Aerts, D. (2002). Contextualizing concepts using a mathematical generalization of the quantum formalism, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 14(4), 327-358. [quant-ph/0205161] [ pdf] Gabora, L. (in press) Self-other organization: Why early life did not evolve through natural selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology, accepted. Gabora, L. & Aerts, D. (2005). Evolution as context-driven actualization of potential: Toward an interdisciplinary theory of change of state. Interdisc. Sci. Rev. 30(1), 69-88. [nlin.AO/0510077] [pdf] Gould, S. J. (1991). Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History (pp. 63-66). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Gruber, H. E. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.) Creative People at Work (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press. Haldane, J. B. S. (1932). The causes of evolution. New York: Longman. Hallpike, C. R. (1986). The principles of social evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hinton, G. E. & J. A. Anderson. (1981). Parallel models of associative memory . Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Howard-Jones, P. A. & Murray, S. (2003). Ideational productivity, focus of attention, and context. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2&3), 153-166. Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2001). A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 511-573. Jeffreys, M. (2000). The meme metaphor. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine , 43(2), 227-242. Jerne, N. (1967). Antibodies and learning: selection versus instruction. In G. Quarton, T. Melnechuk, & F. Schmitt (Eds.), The Neurosciences: A Study Program (pp. 200-205). New York: Rockefeller University Press. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Kauffman, S. A. (1993). Origins of order . New York: Oxford University Press. Lorenz, K. (1971). Studies in animal and human behavior. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Lumsden, C. J. (1999). Evolving creative minds: Stories and mechanisms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp.153-168). New York: Cambridge University Press. McCoy, J. M. & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(384), 409-426. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. Newman S. A. & MŸller, G. B. (1999). Morphological evolution: Epigenetic mechanisms. In Embryonic Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. London: Nature Publishing Group. Okasha, S. (2001). Which processes are selection processes?, Commentary on Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., & Glenn, S. S., A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 548-549. Palm, G. (1980). On associative memory. Biological Cybernetics, 36, 19-31. Pepper, J. W. & Knudsen, T. (2001). Selection without multiple replicators? Commentary on Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., & Glenn, S. S., A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 550. Perkins, D. N. (1998). In the country of the blind: An appreciation of Donald Campbell's vision of creative thought. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 177-191. Perkins, D. N. ( 2000). Archimede' bathtub: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking . New York: W. W. Norton and Company. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works . New York: Harper. Rosch, E. (1999). Reclaiming concepts. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11), 61-78. Pitowsky, I. (1989). Quantum Probability—Quantum Logic: Lecture Notes in Physics 321 , Berlin: Springer. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Routledge. Randall, C. & Foulis, D. (1976). A mathematical setting for inductive reasoning. In C. Hooker (Ed.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science (vol. III, pp. 169). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. Eds. (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge MA: Bradford/MIT Press. Schwartz, J. H. (1999). Sudden origins. New York: Wiley. Simonton, D. K. (19984). Genius, creativity and leadership: Historiometric inquiries . Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.< Simonton, D. K. (1998). Donald Campbell's model of the creative process: Creativity as blind variation and selective retention. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 153-158. Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity . New York: Oxford. Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309-328. Simonton, D. K. (in press). Exceptional creativity and chance: Creative thought as a stochastic combinatorial process. In L. V. Shavinina & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Beyond Knowledge: Extracognitive Facets in Developing High Ability . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1-43. Sober, E. & Wilson, D. S. (1994). A critical review of philosophical work on the units of selection problem. Philosophy of Science, 49, 157-180. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 159-176. Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C. & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2), 75-101. Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity . New York: Free Press. Thagard, P. (1980). Against evolutionary epistomology. In P. D. Asquith & R. N. Giere (Eds.) PSA 1980, p. 187-96. Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97-159. Ziman, J., Ed. (2000). Technical innovation as an evolutionary process . New York: Cambridge University Press. relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 8 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2007-09-12 17:01:23 subjects: - bio-evo - cog-psy - phil-mind - evol-psy - bio-theory succeeds: ~ suggestions: ~ sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: Creative thought as a non-Darwinian evolutionary process type: journalp userid: 352 volume: 39