TY - INPR ID - cogprints4896 UR - http://cogprints.org/4896/ A1 - Nagarjuna, G. Y1 - 2006/// N2 - The essay is a critical review of three possible approaches in the theory of knowledge while tracing the biological roots of knowledge: empiricist, rationalist and developmentalist approaches. Piaget's genetic epistemology, a developmentalist approach, is one of the first comprehensive treatments on the question of tracing biological roots of knowledge. This developmental approach is currently opposed, without questioning the biological roots of knowledge, by the more popular rationalist approach, championed by Chomsky. Developmental approaches are generally coherent with cybernetic models, of which the theory of autopoiesis proposed by Maturana and Varela made a significant theoretical move in proposing an intimate connection between metabolism and knowledge. Modular architecture is currently considered more or less an undisputable model for both biology as well as cognitive science. By suggesting that modulation of modules is possible by motor coordination, a proposal is made to account for higher forms of conscious cognition within the four distinguishable layers of the human mind. Towards the end, the problem of life and cognition is discussed in the context of the evolution of complex cognitive systems, suggesting the unique access of phylogeny during the ontogeny of human beings as a very special case, and how the problem cannot be dealt with independent of the evolution of coding systems in nature. PB - Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture (PHISPC) KW - epistemology KW - Piaget KW - Chomsky KW - genetic epistemology KW - biological roots of cognition KW - knowledge KW - cognitive development KW - rationalism KW - empiricism KW - constructivism KW - Fodor KW - modularity KW - modulation KW - mind KW - cognitive science KW - autopoiesis TI - Tracing the Biological Roots of Knowledge AV - public ER -